I was compared with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "I was compared with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing a situation where someone has made a comparison between you and another person or thing. Example: "During the meeting, I was compared with my predecessor, which made me feel both honored and pressured."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

9 human-written examples

From the middle to both sides in horizontal axis, the value in the X(i) was compared with the threshold.

Nanoscale Research Letters

I didn't even know about him until I was compared with him.

The Guardian - Arts

Group I was compared with group II, and statistical analysis was performed through the use of the Mann-Whitney test.

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology

There was always a sense that there was a preferred sibling, that I was compared with the child who could have been.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Those chimeric proteins were expressed in HEK293T cells and purified by immunoprecipitation, and the affinity to GST-II +I was compared with wild type PP2c by Far-WB analyses.

Plosone

Furthermore, the hydropathy profile of hydrophobins from class I was compared with the profile from class II members as well as hydrophobins from T. terrestris and U. maydis.

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

51 human-written examples

Then, each hyper-edge r i.h involving r i is compared with each hyper-edge r j.h' of r j based on attributes {B k } and {C k }.

Security Informatics

A value for this parameter, θ i, is sampled from the prior distributions, and the summary statistics computed from simulated data S y i) are compared with those of the pseudo-observed data S y0) using the Euclidian distance d.

Genome Biology and Evolution

In this study, the transport of the major metabolites (M1, M2) of ADS-I was compared with the parent compound ADS-I in the same system, and showed that ADS-I is a poorly absorbed compound, M1 and M2 belong to the moderately absorbed compound.

Chemistry Central Journal

There was no difference in diarrhea, anemia, urinary tract infection, polyoma virus infection and impaired wound healing when mTOR-I was compared with MPA.

BMC Nephrology

When mTOR-I was compared with MPA, the risk of lymphocoele was increased by 76 %, despite a similar risk of impaired healing.

BMC Nephrology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "I was compared with", ensure the basis of comparison is clear to avoid ambiguity. Specify the criteria or aspects that were used for comparison to provide context.

Common error

Avoid using "I was compared with" without specifying what you were being compared to and on what basis. Unclear comparisons can lead to misunderstandings and weaken the statement's impact.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "I was compared with" functions as a passive construction indicating that the speaker was the subject of a comparison. It's used to report that someone else made a comparison involving the speaker. As Ludwig AI indicates, this phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

40%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "I was compared with" is a grammatically correct and understandable way to describe being evaluated in relation to someone or something else. While not overly frequent, as Ludwig AI confirms, it finds application across diverse contexts, especially in scientific publications and news media. When employing this phrase, clarity is key; explicitly state the basis and subject of the comparison. Alternatives such as "I was likened to" or "I was contrasted with" offer subtle shifts in meaning. This ensures the intended message is conveyed effectively and precisely.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

I was likened to

This alternative implies a more figurative or imaginative comparison.

I was contrasted with

This alternative emphasizes the differences rather than the similarities.

I was evaluated against

This alternative suggests a formal assessment based on specific criteria.

I was measured against

This implies a more quantitative or objective comparison.

I was benchmarked against

This suggests a comparison against a standard or high-performing entity.

I was assessed in relation to

This is a more formal and comprehensive way of saying compared with.

I was judged alongside

This implies being evaluated simultaneously with something else.

I was paralleled with

This suggests a direct correspondence or similarity between two things.

A comparison was drawn between me and

This is a more formal and passive way of expressing the comparison.

My performance was juxtaposed with

This implies a side-by-side comparison, often highlighting contrasts.

FAQs

How can I use "I was compared with" in a sentence?

Use "I was compared with" to describe a situation where someone drew a parallel or contrast between you and another person or thing. For example: "During the interview, I was compared with the previous candidate."

What is a more formal alternative to "I was compared with"?

A more formal alternative could be "I was evaluated against" or "A comparison was drawn between me and...", depending on the context.

What's the difference between "I was compared with" and "I was contrasted with"?

"I was "contrasted with"" emphasizes the differences between you and another entity, whereas "I was compared with" simply means a comparison, encompassing both similarities and differences, was made.

Is it always appropriate to use "I was compared with" in professional writing?

While generally acceptable, consider the context and audience. In some cases, a more specific or nuanced phrase might be more effective. For instance, "My performance was benchmarked against industry standards" offers more detail.