Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
I was averaged
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "I was averaged" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to express that someone was subjected to averaging in a statistical context, but it lacks clarity and proper usage. Example: "After the test scores were compiled, I found out that I was averaged with the rest of the class, resulting in a lower overall grade."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
3 human-written examples
OF i was averaged over 1,000 triplets.
Science
To estimate the vertical patch size λ z *, the ratio of height h(x i ) to number of cell-type layers, 1 + c(x i ), was averaged across the community cross-section (2) λ z * = (∑ x i [ h (x i ) ] 2 / [ 1 + c (x i ) ] ) / (∑ x i h (x i ) ).
Science
Doxorubicin intensity (I) was averaged over all pixels at a given distance (x) from the nearest vessel and plotted as a function of distance to the nearest vessel.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
57 human-written examples
The cost for pixel i is averaged over its 8-connected neighbors j∈N i).
(vi) If ( T i ), 1 ≤ i ≤ m, is a family of averaged mappings, then the mapping T = ∏ i = 1 m T i is averaged.
I think I was averaging about 15 courses a day.
News & Media
"I was averaging 350 to 400 wins a year".
News & Media
Amis says: "I was averaging an O level a year.
News & Media
"I was averaging an O level a year," explains Amis.
News & Media
"I was averaging something like six turnovers a game," he said.
News & Media
"I was averaging about one movie a year my whole career and that was because I'm fussy.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Instead of saying "I was averaged", specify how your data or performance was incorporated into a broader calculation or statistic. This clarifies the intended meaning.
Common error
Avoid using "I was averaged" because it implies being directly changed by the averaging process. Use more specific language to accurately describe your role or contribution to the calculated average.
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
2.2/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "I was averaged" is an attempt at using the passive voice, but it's grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI indicates that this phrase is not standard English. A correct passive construction would require clarifying what aspect of "I" was being averaged (e.g., "My scores were averaged").
Frequent in
Science
60%
News & Media
40%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "I was averaged" is grammatically incorrect and not considered standard English. Ludwig AI confirms this assessment. While the intended meaning usually involves indicating that the speaker's data was included in an average calculation, more precise and grammatically correct alternatives such as "My results were averaged" or "I was included in the average" should be used instead. The expression is rare and should be avoided in formal writing.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
I was included in the average
Focuses on being a data point within a calculation.
My data was used in the average calculation
Highlights the use of personal data in statistical processing.
I was a component of the average
Emphasizes the role as a contributing factor in an aggregate.
My score was factored into the average
Specifies score inclusion in the calculation.
I contributed to the average
Highlights personal participation in determining group average.
My results were averaged with others
Refers to statistical averaging results with other individuals.
I was part of the averaged data set
Highlights being a data point in set of averaged data.
My value was considered in the average
Emphasizes considering a specific personal value.
The average included my information
Expresses that the statistical average considered your data.
I am represented in the average
States that individual's data is shown in the average value.
FAQs
What does it mean if someone says "I was averaged"?
The phrase "I was averaged" is not standard English and may indicate that someone's data or results were included when calculating an average. A clearer way to express this would be "I was included in the average" or "My results were averaged with others".
How can I use the concept of averaging correctly in a sentence about myself?
Instead of saying "I was averaged", try "My score was "factored into" the average", "I contributed to the average", or "My data was used in the average calculation".
What's a more precise way to say "I was averaged" in a scientific context?
In scientific writing, clarity is key. Instead of "I was averaged", consider using phrases like "My measurements were included in the data set used to calculate the average" or "The average included my information" for better accuracy.
Is "I was averaged" grammatically correct?
No, "I was averaged" is not grammatically correct in standard English. It's more appropriate to say "My results were averaged" or "I was included in the average calculation". The passive voice construction requires a direct object that reflects what exactly was averaged.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
2.2/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested