Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(23)
11 The results are shown in table 3. The predicted ARRstroke(i) varied from 1.22% to 11.65%/year and the predicted ARIbleed(i) varied from 1.07% to 6.95%/year.
[ Na] i and [ K] i varied between 22 and 150 mM according to the intracellular solution used (Table 2).
Thus, the predicted ARR target)i varied from about 1 20% at 10 years, with a slightly different patient stratification depending on the CPG used.
Not all 20 groups had all explanatory variables, so i varied depending on the number of groups who had the given variable available.
Because not all monitors had valid measurements for the entire study period, the number of monthly PM2.5 values at a given monitoring location (n i) varied from 33 to 70.
However, simulations were done exploring all possibilities, so that β e varied within and between hosts in the range 0.0001 0.1; and for the different β e values, i varied between 0.5 and 10 aphids per plant.
Similar(37)
Since Λ i varies from one iteration to the next, F i) varies for each iteration as well, which improves the tracking performance of the resulting algorithms.
3.2 and i varies across time (2001 2009) and space (HCAs of BA, BR, BT, FG, LE, TA).
In addition, the values of N i and Δ t i vary with i.
The possible values of C i vary within a range from −1 to +1.
The values of apoB and apoA-I varied from 30.0 to 218.0 mg/dL and from 50.0 to 300.0 mg/dL, respectively.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com