I thought interesting

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "I thought interesting" is not correct in standard written English.
It is likely intended to express that something was found to be interesting, but it is missing a necessary component, such as a noun or pronoun. Example: "I thought the lecture was interesting."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

But it started and I thought, "Interesting shirt!

Independent

I have now read about 40percentt of it (the first 10 suras, or chapters, and some scattered chapters that I thought interesting).

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

The suggestions here represent just a few possibilities and, I think, interesting ones.

The New York Times

"When I first heard about it I thought, 'How interesting.

The New York Times

And just the image I thought was interesting.

The New York Times

I saw the email when Dr. Ruffin retired, and I thought, "Oh, interesting".

Science Magazine

I thought, how interesting.

Los Angeles Times

I thought they were interesting.

The New York Times

"I thought, 'That's interesting.

The New York Times

I thought it was interesting.

The New York Times - Sports

And I thought: "That's interesting.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use a complete sentence structure when expressing your thoughts. Instead of saying "I thought interesting", use "I thought it was interesting" or "I found it interesting".

Common error

Don't omit the necessary auxiliary verbs or pronouns when expressing your opinions or thoughts. Saying "I thought interesting" leaves the sentence incomplete and grammatically incorrect.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "I thought interesting" functions as an incomplete expression of opinion. It attempts to convey that the speaker found something interesting, but lacks the necessary grammatical structure to do so effectively. As Ludwig AI points out, the phrase requires a noun or pronoun to be grammatically sound.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Academia

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "I thought interesting" might appear in informal contexts, it's grammatically incorrect in standard English. As Ludwig AI indicates, the phrase needs a complete sentence structure, such as "I thought it was interesting" or "I found it interesting", to be correct. The limited number of examples suggests it's a rare construction, and its usage is generally confined to informal settings. For formal writing, using grammatically sound alternatives is crucial.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

I found it interesting

Replaces the incorrect phrase with a grammatically sound alternative, using 'found' to indicate the experience of finding something interesting.

I thought it was interesting

Adds the necessary 'it was' to make the sentence grammatically correct, explicitly stating what the speaker found interesting.

I considered it interesting

Uses 'considered' to express a more thoughtful assessment of something as interesting.

I deemed it interesting

Employs 'deemed' for a more formal tone, suggesting a judgment that something is interesting.

I regarded it as interesting

Expresses viewing something in a particular way, specifically as interesting.

It struck me as interesting

Indicates that something had an immediate interesting impact on the speaker.

I was interested in it

Focuses on the speaker's state of being interested, rather than the act of thinking.

I took an interest in it

Highlights the act of becoming interested or paying attention to something.

I was intrigued by it

Uses 'intrigued' to suggest a sense of fascination or curiosity.

It piqued my interest

Indicates that something stimulated the speaker's interest.

FAQs

What's the correct way to say "I thought interesting"?

The correct way to express this idea is to say "I thought it was interesting" or "I found it interesting". The original phrase is missing necessary grammatical elements.

What does "I thought interesting" mean?

The phrase "I thought interesting" is grammatically incorrect, but it's generally understood to mean that the speaker found something to be interesting. Proper alternatives would be "I thought it was interesting" or "I found it interesting".

Is it ever correct to say "I thought interesting"?

In standard written English, it's not correct to say "I thought interesting". It's an incomplete thought and violates grammatical rules. Use "I thought it was interesting" instead.

What are some alternatives to "I thought it was interesting"?

Alternatives include "I found it interesting", "I considered it interesting", or "It struck me as interesting", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.