Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
Suppose that ω → ∈ A p →, ν ω → = ∏ i = 1 m ω i p p i and b → ∈ ( BMO ) l. Then we have (i) There then exists a constant C > 0 such that ∥ T Π b →, q ( f → ) ∥ L p ≤ ∏ j = 1 l ∥ b j ∥ BMO ∏ j = 1 m ∥ | f j | q j ∥ L p j ( M w j ). (ii) If ω j ∈ A p j, then there exists a constant C > 0 such that ∥ T Π b →, q ( f → ) ∥ L p ≤ ∏ j = 1 l ∥ b j ∥ BMO ∏ j = 1 m ∥ | f j | q j ∥ L p j ( w j ). .
No sooner am I there then a great flurry of paparazzi flashbulbs outside explode.
Similar(56)
Is there, then, a way to protect fans who may be less interested in a sport that protects them completely?
Is there, then, a danger that others – Cesc Fabregas, for instance – might feel the same way, particularly if the trophy drought continues?
Is there then no way the big three PC makers can stop Dell?
Is there then a third way to understand the quantifiers that is neither referential nor substitutional?
Is there then a role for theory in bioethics, and, if so, what kinds of theory?
Is there, then, a connection between adaptation of organisms to their environment, selection on those adaptations, and diversity?
Is there then any reason to prefer the ontology of M to that of QM? M contains people but no sets of people, whereas QM contains sets of people but no people.
Is there, then, an optimum amount of variability?
Is there, then, any reason to pursue glycemic control in critically ill patients?
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com