Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
I started work for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "I started work for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when indicating the beginning of employment with a specific company or organization. Example: "I started work for the new marketing agency last month."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Alternative expressions(20)
I started working for
I was appointed to
I was recruited by
I was hired by
I affiliated with
I started looking for
I started yelling for
I started planning for
I was working for
I started going for
I started searching for
I started baking for
I started writing for
I started settling for
I started cooking for
I was headed to
i was appointed to
i was assumed to
I was selected
I was dispatched
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
4 human-written examples
I started work for a left-wing pensions advisory company.
News & Media
I started work for a few months with a relatively small Italian bunker with an office in London, as a trainee trader there.
News & Media
Personal assistant, from 1978 I didn't meet Thatcher until the day I started work for her, which was the 10 September 1978 when I went to the House of Commons as a package deal with David Wolfson.
News & Media
"I started work for him in 1999 and learned what the business was about.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
56 human-written examples
Eventually, I started working for a rodeo company in Del Rio.
News & Media
When I returned to chemistry, I started working for John G. Kirkwood.
Academia
"So I started working for Lois Woodhull at the Plantage".
News & Media
It's why I started working for myself 15 years ago.
News & Media
"I took her class, then I started working for her," Ms. McKay said.
News & Media
I started working for the business publisher Dun & Bradstreet in the mid-1970s.
News & Media
It's here that eBay stopped working for me, and I started working for eBay.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use it to clearly indicate the commencement of your employment with a specific organization, especially when narrating your career history or professional experiences.
Common error
Avoid using "I started work for" without specifying the company or organization. Instead of saying "I started work for a company", provide the company's name to give your statement more clarity and impact.
Source & Trust
93%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "I started work for" functions as an intransitive verb phrase indicating the commencement of employment with a specific entity. It serves to introduce a period of professional engagement, as demonstrated in Ludwig's examples.
Frequent in
News & Media
100%
Less common in
Science
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Academia
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "I started work for" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression to indicate the beginning of employment with a specific organization. Ludwig AI affirms its correctness. While suitable for various contexts, it is advisable to specify the organization clearly and consider more formal alternatives for highly professional settings. Its prevalence in news and media sources underscores its widespread understanding and acceptance in general communication. Remember to avoid vague references and always specify the company for clarity.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
I began employment with
Uses a more formal term, "employment", instead of "work", and replaces "started" with "began".
I took up employment at
Implies actively seeking and obtaining employment.
I commenced working at
Replaces "started" with "commenced", which is more formal, and uses "at" instead of "for" with "working".
I took a position with
Emphasizes the acceptance of a specific position or role within the company.
I joined the team at
Indicates joining a team within the organization, rather than general employment.
I was appointed to
Suggests a more formal or official assignment to a role.
I was recruited by
Emphasizes being actively sought out by the organization for employment.
I was hired by
Focuses on the hiring aspect, indicating that the organization initiated the employment.
My career began at
Focuses on the start of a career path within the organization.
My first day at
Refers to the first day of work. It has a temporal meaning.
FAQs
How can I use "I started work for" in a sentence?
Use "I started work for" to indicate the beginning of your employment at a specific organization. For example, "I started work for a tech startup last year."
What is a more formal alternative to "I started work for"?
A more formal alternative is "I began employment with". This phrase is suitable for professional contexts and formal documents.
Is it correct to say "I started working for" instead of "I started work for"?
Yes, "I started working for" is also correct and frequently used. The choice between the two often depends on personal preference.
What's the difference between "I started work for" and "I began to work for"?
"I started work for" is a more direct and concise way of expressing the beginning of employment. "I began to work for" can sometimes imply a gradual start or a period of transitioning into the role.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
93%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested