Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
We have proved that Ω i satisfies all the conditions in Lemma 3.1.
It is easy to check that ∑ i = 1 N a i F i satisfies all the conditions of Theorem 3.1 and EP ( ∑ i = 1 N a i F i ) = ⋂ i = 1 N EP ( F i ) = { 0 }.
It is easy to check that Ψ i satisfies all the conditions of Theorem 3.1 and EP ( ∑ i = 1 N a i Ψ i ) = ⋂ i = 1 N EP ( Ψ i ) = { 0 }.
The proof is to verify I satisfies all the conditions of Theorem 3.4.
We will verify that I satisfies all the conditions of Theorem B.
Thus the functional I satisfies all the conditions of Lemma 2.7, and then I has a critical point, and (1.1) has at least one solution.
Proof For any Γ ∈ Ω 2 and any i ∈ I, define the corresponding F i Γ : X i ⇉ X by F i Γ ( y i ) = { x ∈ X ∣ f i ( y i, x − i ) ≤ f i ( x ) }. Clearly, F Γ = ( F i Γ ) i ∈ I satisfies all the conditions of Theorem 2.1.
In this regard, any sequence, say { X k } in ⨂ i = 1 N Λ i satisfies all the conditions of the Arzela-Ascoli theorem on [0,T].
MAVEN will visualize all SNPs that satisfy all the conditions.
Assume l0 with 1 ≤ L < l0< H ≤ N is the point at which the inner loop finishes, i.e., μ ~ ( L, l 0 ) satisfies all the conditions from L to l0.
Since ∑ i = 1 ∞ ( 1 - b i ) λ < ∞ is satisfied, all the conditions of previous theorem are fulfilled.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com