Exact(3)
I can remember her looking back at me and saying simply, "For what?" I responded, "For this, and for everything you have to go through".
"Thank you," I responded, for the first time surrendering myself to a Higher Power, to something outside of myself, to something bigger than my own fragile emotions.
Jamie Weinstein, for example, from the Daily Caller, asked me to please tell him the truth about whether I'd written the book, and I responded for the zillionth time, that yes I had, and please split the royalties, and he said several times, 'No.
Similar(56)
That's right, I respond, for the simple reason that they're one of us.
I responded: "Thanks for making my point".
For this reason, I responded to a call for applications for scientific attaché positions launched by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
I responded that except for the facts that I don't have any friends in the C.I.A. (that I know of) and that I've never thought, let alone said, something like that, I was in Philadelphia that day.
I responded, still looking for the explanation.
It began by her asking me how I was and I responded quite typically for me, "All is good.
Despite my deep-rooted instinct to be friendly, I responded to requests for me to help carry equipment with polite refusals.
Is he a psychic?" I responded hyper-seriously for my own amusement: "No, he is a legendary collector and museum director," mimicking the manner I had heard him introduce himself.
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com