Exact(15)
Developed as a self-reported paper instrument, the SCA evaluates patient satisfaction in four care domains on a 7-point Likert scale: (i) outcome of cancer care, (ii) care provider manner and skill, (iii) information provided about care, and (iv) waiting time/access to care.
The primary issues are (i) outcome measures used by meta-analyses with zero events; (ii) use of continuity corrections; (iii) methods for inclusion of primary studies with zero events that do not involve continuity corrections; and (iv) incorporation of primary studies with zero events in both arms.
Scores from each of the three first temporal principal components were included as continuous explanatory variables in two separate logistic regression analyses, with (i) outcome of DFM-related consultation, and (ii) fetal health at the time of DFM consultation serving as dependent variables, respectively.
While it is already widely recognised that previous research may assist in defining such important details as i) outcome definitions; ii) hypotheses under test, as well as making sure pitfalls of previous studies are avoided, [ 4] less consideration has previously been given to quantitative design issues, such as the sample size of a future RCT.
Engel Class I outcome was achieved in 18/29 (62%) patients; with complete seizure freedom in 9/29 (31%) patients (Engel Class IA).
Three (10%) patients had neurological deficits including one permanent superior quadrantanopsia, one transient trochlear, and one transient oculomotor nerve palsy.CONCLUSIONS: Overall, Engel Class I outcome was achieved in 62% of patients with MTLE, and 97% of patients achieved >50% seizure frequency reduction.
Similar(45)
Is "outcome" relative to "early outcome" or are both compared with preoperative neurological status?
Prescott's test was used to compare dichotomized CGI-I outcomes during the crossover phase.
A 1-point worsening in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score provided excellent discrimination (86% specificity; 84% sensitivity) of type I outcomes.
I want the outcome, I want FGM to end, and I will make sure those promises are kept.
The study relies on I PET/CT being predictive for I-treatment outcome.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com