Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Using a noninvasive approach to determine K i, Takikawa et al. reported a mean K i OCC value of 6.6 ± 1.8 × 10-3 min-1 in healthy volunteers pretreated with carbidopa [19].
Similar(59)
The electronic density n(r) is given by a sum over occupied wave functions: n ( r ) = 2 ∑ i ∈ occ | φ i ( r ) | 2, (4).
exacer hol, press, occ, puls, cont, mod, occ.
Occ i * and Inad i * are latent variables assumed to underlie the experience of respective transition outcomes, with (X_{i }) as a vector of variables (including the number of job vacancies) that determine these mismatch situations.
Then, according to the definition of (l, d) motif, the probability of a random (l, d) instance m′ of motif m occurring in a sequence can be calculated by (9) P occ = ∑ i = 0 d P d i 1 l i × 3 i.
Based on C and Occ, the SA interval [ I a, I b] can be recursively calculated, from the rightmost to the leftmost suffixes of S, as: (1) where I a(i) and I b(i) represent the starting and end indices of the SA interval for the suffix of S starting at position i, and I a(| S|) and I b(| S|) are initialized as 0 and | T|, respectively.
Hence, searching for a pattern P takes linear time on the size of P plus the number of its occurrences in S, i.e., O(L + occ) as in suffix trees.
Prospective data on alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking and risk of head-neck cancer (HNC) subtypes, i.e. oral cavity cancer (OCC), oro-/hypopharyngeal cancer (OHPC), and laryngeal cancer (LC), are limited.
Following the taxonomy in the survey papers of [15 17], the algorithms used in OCC can be categorized as follows: (i) boundary methods, (ii) density estimation, and (iii) reconstruction methods.
Hence, the probability that all the channels are occupied can be found using the Erlang B formula [21] and is given by P occ = G N - 1 ( N - 1 ) ! ∑ i = 0 N - 1 G i i !, (A-1).
Compared with never cigarette smokers, current cigarette smokers had a RR of 4.49 (95%CI 3.11-6.48) for HNC overall, and 2.11 for OCC, 8.53 for OHPC, and 8.07 for LC.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com