I interviewed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "I interviewed" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to the act of conducting an interview, typically in a professional or academic context. Example: "I interviewed several candidates for the position and found the perfect fit for our team."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

I interviewed Michael Morpurgo.

The Guardian

"I interviewed him.

The New York Times

"I interviewed him twice.

The Guardian - Film

I interviewed him once.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

When I interviewed Mme.

The New Yorker

In 2011 I interviewed Clifford.

The Guardian

I interviewed him several times.

The New York Times

"I interviewed Senator Mark Pryor.

The New York Times

I looked around, I interviewed.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

I interviewed two teachers, at different schools.

The New Yorker

I interviewed him on two more occasions.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "I interviewed" repeatedly in close proximity. Use synonyms such as "I spoke with" or "I had a conversation with" to vary your language and maintain reader engagement.

Common error

Avoid using "I interviewed" when a simple conversation or casual discussion occurred. Use less formal language such as "I talked to" or "I chatted with" to accurately reflect the nature of the interaction.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "I interviewed" functions as a declarative statement where the subject ("I") performs the action of interviewing. This is a direct assertion of an action taken by the speaker, commonly used in reports, articles, and personal narratives as shown by Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Science

15%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Academia

2%

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "I interviewed" is a versatile and commonly used phrase for indicating the act of conducting an interview. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically sound and widely accepted. While "I interviewed" is suitable for professional and neutral registers, remember to provide context and vary your language to maintain engagement. Avoid using it in overly informal settings, opting for phrases like "I spoke with". By understanding its purpose, register, and common usage patterns, you can effectively incorporate "I interviewed" into your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

I conducted an interview with

Replaces the simple verb with a more formal and explicit phrase using "conducted".

I spoke with

Offers a more general alternative, suitable when the conversation was less structured than a formal interview.

I had a conversation with

Similar to "I spoke with" but emphasizes the reciprocal nature of the exchange.

I questioned

Focuses on the act of asking questions, which is a core part of interviewing.

I examined

Suggests a more in-depth and investigative approach to the conversation.

I consulted with

Implies a professional or expert consultation during the interaction.

I met with

A more neutral alternative indicating a meeting took place, without specifying the interview's formality.

I had a meeting with

Similar to "I met with", highlighting the scheduled nature of the interaction.

I had the opportunity to interview

Emphasizes the chance or privilege of conducting the interview.

My interview with

Shifts the focus to the interview itself, rather than the act of interviewing.

FAQs

What are some alternatives to "I interviewed"?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "I spoke with", "I conducted an interview with", or "I had a conversation with". Each conveys a slightly different nuance regarding the formality and structure of the interaction.

How can I make my writing more engaging when using "I interviewed"?

Instead of simply stating "I interviewed [person]", provide context about who the person is and why their insights are valuable. This immediately piques the reader's interest and highlights the significance of the interview.

Is it appropriate to use "I interviewed" in academic writing?

Yes, "I interviewed" is perfectly acceptable in academic writing, especially in qualitative research or case studies. Just ensure you provide sufficient detail about the interviewee and the methodology used.

What's the difference between saying "I interviewed" and "I had an interview with"?

Saying "I interviewed" is more direct and concise, focusing on your action of conducting the interview. "I had an interview with" places more emphasis on the interview itself as an event or interaction. The choice depends on which aspect you want to highlight.