I identified to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "I identified to" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly; the correct form would involve a different preposition or structure depending on the intended meaning. Example: "I identified to my supervisor the issues we were facing."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

Similarly, the table represents the percentage of images of class i identified to class j with respect to the total number of images in the test set.

EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing

I identified to both the Carolyn who was powerless over alcohol and at the same time was beginning to understand that I was a limitless Spiritual being capable of the most impossible seeming miracles when I could align with my Source.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Testing my assumptions The next step was to research the areas I had identified to test my assumptions.

The Guardian

I identified myself to the demonstrators and one among them shouted to the others: "This is a good man.

Huffington Post

Reports from Phase I identified barriers to nutrition screening and assessment.

BMC Medical Research Methodology

I left the identifying to her.

The New Yorker

But "I don't identify to the point to where it disturbs my own rhythms".

The New York Times

I identify them to the family level or further and label them: wolf spiders, fishing spiders, widow spiders, goblin spiders.

The New York Times

Once I identified them, I got to work changing them, and years later… I haven't looked back.

Huffington Post

After I identified myself, I was escorted to my seat.

The New York Times

So I identified as a Texan because I wanted to identify with my father so much.

Vice

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "I identified to" in formal writing. Opt for clearer and grammatically correct alternatives such as "I reported to", "I communicated to", or rephrase the sentence for better clarity.

Common error

The preposition "to" typically requires an indirect object (a person or thing being acted upon). With "identified", it's more appropriate to use prepositions like "with" (to express a connection) or "as" (to define something). For reporting information, use verbs like "reported", "stated", or "informed" instead.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "I identified to" functions as a declarative statement, although it is grammatically flawed. Ludwig AI indicates it is not correct in standard written English. The intended purpose is usually to convey the speaker's action of reporting or communicating something to someone.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "I identified to" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. As Ludwig AI points out, it is not the correct form. Although there are a few examples of its use, it's advisable to use clearer and more grammatically accepted alternatives like "I reported to", "I communicated to", or rephrase the sentence altogether. The phrase appears rarely and spans contexts such as news, media, and science. When aiming to express a connection or shared experience, "identify with" is more appropriate. Therefore, while the intent might be understood, avoiding "I identified to" will enhance clarity and grammatical correctness in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

I reported to

Replaces "identified to" with a more standard verb indicating the act of communicating information.

I communicated to

Similar to 'reported to', this emphasizes the act of conveying information to someone.

I made known to

A more formal alternative, suggesting a deliberate act of informing someone.

I disclosed to

Indicates the revealing of previously unknown information.

I revealed to

Similar to 'disclosed to', highlighting the unveiling of something.

I pointed out to

Focuses on highlighting a specific detail or piece of information.

I indicated to

Suggests a less direct form of communication, perhaps through hints or suggestions.

I designated to

This implies assigning something or someone to a specific role or purpose.

I related to

Implies establishing a connection with something or someone.

I aligned with

Suggests finding common ground or shared principles.

FAQs

Is "I identified to" grammatically correct?

No, "I identified to" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. It's better to use phrases like "I reported to", "I communicated to", or rephrase the sentence for clarity.

What are some alternatives to "I identified to"?

Depending on the context, you can use phrases such as "I reported to", "I communicated to", "I aligned with", or "I related to".

When is it appropriate to use "identify with" instead of "I identified to"?

"Identify with" expresses a sense of connection or shared experience. For example, "I identify with her struggles". This is different from trying to report information, where phrases like "I reported to" are more suitable.

What's the difference between "I identified myself as" and "I identified to"?

"I identified myself as [something]" is correct when you are stating your role or affiliation. For instance, "I identified myself as a doctor". The phrase "I identified to", without rephrasing, is generally not considered grammatically correct.