Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
I was on my way down into the subway in Soho when I identified someone fifteen feet ahead of me (back turned, talking intimately with his friend) as a man I knew, or had seen before.
Similar(58)
Also, are there any basic programs that do facial recognition — can I identify someone once and it automatically tags that person in all the pictures?
The reason is that even if every participant presented with a target-present lineup identified someone (i.e., if responding were maximally liberal), it is unlikely that everyone would successfully recognize the guilty suspect because it is unlikely that everyone formed a clear memory of the perpetrator at study.
That is the maximum possible FAR because even if every witness presented with a fair target-absent lineup identified someone (i.e., if responding were maximally liberal such that a "yes" response were made to every target-absent lineup), witnesses would land on the innocent suspect by chance only 1/6 of the time and would land on a filler the other 5/6 of the time.
Mr. Olsen had identified someone else before he identified Mr. Pratt.
Traditionally, an officer who identified someone in court had to demonstrate prior acquaintance with the individual.
His conviction was based on the testimony of three other inmates; a guard identified someone else as the likely killer.
Sometimes the super-recognizers have identified someone as the culprit of a crime only to discover that the suspect was in jail when the incident took place.
He identified someone within the company suited to do the job and then worked with him for three months.
If a little of everything seems to lead us to the ideal personality, it also, I fear, identifies someone who would bore us to death.
For example, even after watching that excellent explainer video, I don't think I could confidently identify someone who was offside, or communicate with certainty the difference between a "ruck" and a "maul".
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com