Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
I have known
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"I have known" is correct and usable in written English.
It is usually used when referring to something that has been known for a period of time. For example: "I have known her since we were children."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Alternative expressions(20)
I have realised
I have anticipated
I know
I have informed
I have complied
I have upheld
I have forgotten
I have understood
I have identified
I have shown
I have subscribed to
I am acquainted with
I've encountered
I have corresponded
I have emulated
I have learned
I have appreciated
I have discovered
I have accompanied
I have told
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
53 human-written examples
I have known a man.
News & Media
I have known speed.
News & Media
Should I have known?
News & Media
I have known for a long time.
News & Media
I have known Roberta a long time.
News & Media
'Bye, great dogs I have known.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
6 human-written examples
"I've known warriors.
News & Media
I've known subtler juxtapositions.
News & Media
I've known you forever.
News & Media
I've known it all along".
News & Media
I've known a few of them.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When writing, ensure the context clearly indicates the duration and depth of your acquaintance or knowledge. Avoid vagueness to maintain clarity.
Common error
Avoid using "I have known" when referring to something encountered only briefly or recently. This phrase is best suited for situations where familiarity has developed over time.
Source & Trust
91%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "I have known" functions as the main verb in a sentence, indicating a state of awareness or familiarity that has persisted over time. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically correct and commonly used. Examples show it used to describe relationships with people, places, or ideas.
Frequent in
News & Media
78%
Science
12%
Formal & Business
5%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "I have known" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase to express long-term familiarity or awareness. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability. It is most commonly found in news and media, science, and formal business contexts. When writing, using "I have known" effectively requires understanding its emphasis on duration and depth of familiarity. Common errors involve using it for brief encounters. Consider alternatives like "I am familiar with" or "I am aware of" when describing less established knowledge. The high frequency of "I have known" and its presence across authoritative sources like The New York Times and The Guardian underscore its importance in effective communication.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
I am acquainted with
This alternative suggests a level of familiarity but might imply a less deep or prolonged relationship than "I have known".
I am familiar with
This option indicates awareness or understanding, not necessarily implying a personal connection or long-term relationship as "I have known" does.
I've been aware of
Focuses on awareness of something, rather than a personal connection or experience, differing slightly from "I have known".
I have experience with
This suggests practical involvement or exposure, which may or may not be implied by "I have known".
I recognize
Implies acknowledgement or awareness, potentially lacking the depth of familiarity suggested by "I have known".
I'm conversant with
Suggests knowledge and ability to discuss something, not necessarily implying a personal or long-term association as "I have known" does.
I've encountered
This alternative focuses on having met or experienced something, whereas "I have known" indicates a continued or deeper familiarity.
I've dealt with
Suggests handling or managing something, which differs from the familiarity implied by "I have known".
I'm conscious of
Emphasizes awareness or realization, but does not necessarily imply familiarity or long-term knowledge, unlike "I have known".
I'm mindful of
Highlights being aware and attentive to something, differing from the familiarity or personal connection implied by "I have known".
FAQs
How can I use "I have known" in a sentence?
Use "I have known" to indicate familiarity with a person, place, or thing over a period. For example, "I have known him for years" or "I have known this city since I was a child".
What's the difference between "I have known" and "I know"?
"I know" implies a current state of awareness, while "I have known" suggests knowledge gained and maintained over time. Using "I know" is suitable for immediate facts; "I have known" highlights a history of awareness.
What can I say instead of "I have known" to indicate less familiarity?
If you want to express less familiarity, consider alternatives like "I am aware of" or "I am familiar with", which imply some knowledge without suggesting a long-term relationship.
Is "I've known" the same as "I have known"?
Yes, "I've known" is a contraction of "I have known" and carries the same meaning. Both forms are grammatically correct and can be used interchangeably.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
91%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested