Exact(9)
Both individuals (FK and KL) in the feature-based dependency group successfully passed all generalization tests: they (i) generalized from black training stimuli to colored test stimuli, (ii) successfully completed the extension test (increasing stimulus length), and (iii) generalized the dependency rule to relationships between novel shapes (Tests 1, 2 and 3, see Table 1).
None of the methods for adding full atomic detail to coarse-grain structures mentioned above are (i) generalized for many types of independently generated coarse-grain structures, (ii) validated on a range of structures sizes and (iii) publicly available.
We prove: (i) generalized Weyl's theorem holds for f(T) for every f ∈ H(σ (T)); (ii) generalized a-Browder's theorem holds for f(S) for every S ≺ T and f ∈ H(σ(S)); (iii) the spectral mapping theorem holds for the B-Weyl spectrum of T.
(i) generalized Weyl's theorem holds for T ∗ (resp. for d A ∗, B ∗ ). (ii) generalized Weyl's theorem holds for T (resp. for d A, B ). (iii) Weyl's theorem holds for T (resp. for d A, B ). . generalized Weyl's theorem holds for T ∗ (resp. for d A ∗, B ∗ ).
(i) generalized strictly feasible in the weak sense if F w + ≠ ∅, where F w + = x ∈ K | F ( u, x, x + y ) ⋂ int C ≠ ∅, ∀ y ∈ K ∞ { 0 }, u ∈ T ( x ) ; (ii) generalized strictly feasible in the strong sense if F s + ≠ ∅, where F s + = { x ∈ K | F ( u, x, x + y ) ⊆ int C, ∀ y ∈ K ∞ { 0 }, u ∈ T ( x ) }. Obviously, both F w +, F s + are equivalent to the F s + [19], when F is a single-valued map.
I generalized it to many kinds of behavior in that 1978 book".
Similar(51)
Remark 10.4 Note that Theorem 10.1(i) generalizes and extends some results of Pathak and Shahzad [[21], Theorem 3.7] and Wardowski [[20], Theorem 3.3].
In this paper I generalize some of the previous results by deriving eigenvector eigenvalue relations for general non-symmetric matrices.
(I generalize).
I generalize everything from my previous relationship to all relationships.
Why do we join a club we aren't sure we really want to be in -- in fact based on public sentiment around privacy and intrusion I believe I'm on safe ground when I generalize that I'm ready to bet if we really thought about it -- most of us would not want to be in it.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com