Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(7)
Now obviously postmodernist intellectuals are about 1,000 times more intelligent than me, because I only know about science and computers, but I found this paper so confusing I thought it might be a spoof.
Even though I found this paper of great interest, the print media did not, and as a result it did not get much popular publicity, but I decided to include it anyway.
Evidence: I found this paper by Cynamon and Fazzari to be the most systematic and compelling analysis of this chain.
I found this paper very interesting to read.
I found this paper to be very clearly written both at a general and technical level.
Although I am an experimental physicist doing biological problems, I found this paper a tough read and I think the authors could make more of an effort to make this accessible to both biologists and physicists.
Similar(53)
I find this paper by Gesto-Borroto et al. to be well written and analyzed.
I find this paper highly relevant and it most certainly deserves publication, even more so because it is controversial.
All in all, I find this paper is a mixture between an opinion piece, a methods piece, and an overview piece.
Referee Comment: " All in all, I find this paper is a mixture between an opinion piece, a methods piece, and an overview piece.
As someone who is often frustrated at how slowly science moves forward I find this paper-mania rather useful.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com