Significant sex phthalate interactions (i.e., significant differences in the slope of the association between log-LMWP and behavior between girls and boys) were found for the aggression, conduct problems, hyperactivity, externalizing problems, and BSI.
With one exception, the statistical relevance of the differences between the groups (i.e., significant differences or no significant differences) remained the same regardless of the number of trials included.
For the associations that reached whole brain significance (i.e. significant after FDR correction for multiple comparisons), we investigated whether the association was driven by genes or environment.
In fact, we asked how many of the predicted (i.e significant) pathway activation differences between major SSP subtypes in each ER+/ER- class were also significantly different in Set2 (Additional file 8).
None of the three volunteers fulfilled any exclusion criteria (i.e., significant abnormal physical examination, evidence of any significant illness from history, clinical, or para-clinical findings).
The non-parametric Wilcoxon test tests more conservatively than the t-test, i.e. significant results by the Wilcoxon test will also be significant by the t-test, but not vice versa.
The likelihood of students being readers with low proficiency was negatively related to students' reading self-concept (i.e., significant coefficient γ30(1)) and positively related to peer bullying (i.e., significant coefficient γ50(1)).
Neither hot effects (i.e., significant increases in mortality associated with hot temperatures) nor cold effects (i.e., significant increases in mortality associated with cold temperatures) were apparent after a 20-day lag, with relative risks close to 1 across the entire range of temperatures [see Supplemental Material, Figure 1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1103598)].
Further, convergent and discriminant validity of the scale aligns with previous validations in younger populations, i.e. significant positive correlations with self-efficacy, self-mastery, and medical outcome social support surveys and a significant negative correlation with depression [ 33, 34].
The significant Clutch × Food interaction indicates that clutches differed significantly in development time across different food concentrations (i.e., significant phenotypic plasticity).
The level of significance was set to a 2-fold relative difference between samples, i.e. significant fold change 0.5 < 2-ΔΔCT > 2 for down- and up-regulated genes respectively.
