Exact(2)
If ∑ i = 1 n p i x i = c is any convex combination from ℐ with the center at c, then using the affinity of f { c } line, it follows that f ( ∑ i = 1 n p i x i ) = f { c } line ( ∑ i = 1 n p i x i ) = ∑ i = 1 n p i f { c } line ( x i ) ≤ ∑ i = 1 n p i f ( x i ), concluding the proof in the case that the line is below the curve.
Why am I concluding that Mr. Romney would have chosen Mr. Ryan only if he felt he was losing?
Similar(56)
The arguments from (i) conclude the proof.
Too difficult, I concluded.
These people are so young, I concluded.
"I concluded they organized the kidnapping".
This had to be Toal, I concluded.
The US led the race, I concluded.
I concluded yes to both".
I concluded that they didn't.
I concluded she would do them good.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com