Sentence examples for I comparisons from inspiring English sources

To this, there are two main approaches or paradigms: (i) comparisons of physiological readings across periods of time to indicate different arousal levels under different circumstances, and (ii) the detection of short-term (occurring in seconds) physiological changes in response to specific events.

Main effects of statistical analyses of interest were those that related to (i) comparisons of the vehicle groups between young and old mice and (ii) the level of chaperone induction in either young or old mice.

We have recently developed and begun to characterize the roles of the IGFs, their receptors and modulatory binding proteins in an in vitro murine cell model of SkM aging via the following: (i) comparisons of parental (older) vs. daughter (younger) cell populations and (ii) multiple population doublings as a way of artificially aging cells (Sharples et al., 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013).

Array experiments where a stronger SARD1: SID2 correlation was observed included: (f) Phytophthora parasitica infection of roots; (g) combined mutations in ABA signalling and SA biosynthesis; (h) mutations in the exocycst component EXO70A1; (i) comparisons of potassium starvation and caesium toxicity (NASCARRAYS468; GEO GSE16913, [ 28]; NASCARRAYS435; NASCARRAYS105).

Relevant information to explore the notion of such a trade-off comes from (i) comparisons of viral suppression, host fitness and Wolbachia density between infected hosts, (ii) inferences from natural populations and (iii) mechanistic understanding of the common basis of viral interference.

(I) Comparisons of the binding capacity of CTCF to both WT M1 and Mut M1 by ChIP-qPCR.

We will present results of the following comparisons: (i) Comparison with earlier versions of SHR [27].

i Comparison of the SERS spectra obtained from Au-capped silicon nanowire arrays prepared with different etching times.

(i ) Comparison of resonant confocal and 2-photon microscopy signal stengths in the imaging culture chambes.

(i) Comparison of estimated beta values between the Oslo2 and DBCG cohort, and (ii) between the Oslo2 and TCGA cohort.

i Comparison of European origin, benchmark versus prevention studies, chisquared test = 1.4, one degree of freedom P = 0.24.