Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
I checked it for errors
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "I checked it for errors" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to indicate that you have reviewed something to identify and correct any mistakes. Example: "Before submitting the report, I checked it for errors to ensure its accuracy."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Academia
Alternative expressions(2)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
60 human-written examples
I then make a preview render, check it for errors and start rendering.
News & Media
All study data were checked for errors and implausible values (i.e., caused through typing errors).
Science
"I don't see how they can check for errors if they don't know your situation," says Richard Mannion from accountants Smith & Williamson.
News & Media
The IRS uses electronic scanning methods when it can to check for errors and process tax forms.
News & Media
The computational basis was checked for errors when used for solving a quantum algorithm.
During real-time ground contacts with the APL ground station, downlinked files are checked for errors.
Science
The data was relayed to a computer, decompressed, and checked for errors using the error correction code.
Academia
Ten percent of the entries were double checked for errors.
Science
The sequences were carefully checked for errors during retrievement.
Science
This is in contrast to error correction in DNA replication where only the genotype is checked for errors.
Science
Gene models are manually checked for errors such as in-frame stops, very short proteins, splits, merges, etc.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using the phrase "I checked it for errors", ensure that the context clearly indicates what "it" refers to. This avoids ambiguity and ensures clarity in your writing.
Common error
While automated tools can assist in error detection, do not solely rely on them. Always manually review the content after using automated checkers to catch nuanced errors or context-specific mistakes that automated tools may miss.
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "I checked it for errors" functions as a statement indicating a review process. It communicates that the speaker has examined something (represented by "it") with the specific intention of finding and correcting errors. This aligns with Ludwig's assessment of its grammatical correctness.
Frequent in
Science
30%
News & Media
30%
Academia
20%
Less common in
Formal & Business
10%
Wiki
5%
Encyclopedias
5%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "I checked it for errors" is a grammatically sound and understandable phrase used to convey that something has been reviewed for mistakes. Ludwig highlights its grammatical correctness. Though examples are limited, the phrase appears across various contexts, from news and media to scientific publications, indicating broad applicability. While the register is generally neutral, the phrase serves to assure the audience of due diligence and attention to detail. For alternative phrasing, options like "I verified it for mistakes" or "I proofread it to find errors" can be used to add nuance or formality. Remember that while automated tools can help, a manual review is always best practice.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
I verified it for mistakes
Replaces "checked for errors" with "verified for mistakes", maintaining a similar level of formality.
I double-checked it for any errors
Highlights that the check was performed twice for extra certainty.
I proofread it to find errors
Specifies the type of check as proofreading, focusing on surface-level errors.
I reviewed it for inaccuracies
Uses "reviewed" and "inaccuracies" to convey the checking process and the type of errors sought.
I examined it to correct errors
Emphasizes the examination process and the intent to correct any errors found.
I inspected it for faults
Substitutes "inspected" and "faults" offering a slightly more formal tone.
I went over it for mistakes
Uses the phrasal verb "went over" to describe the checking process, creating a more informal tone.
I scrutinized it for inaccuracies
Replaces "checked" with "scrutinized", indicating a more thorough and detailed examination.
I made sure it was error-free
Shifts the focus to the outcome of the checking process, emphasizing the absence of errors.
I gave it an error check
Uses "gave it an error check" to describe the process, with a more conversational tone.
FAQs
What does it mean to say "I checked it for errors"?
Saying "I checked it for errors" means you have reviewed something, such as a document or piece of code, to find and correct any mistakes or inaccuracies.
What can I say instead of "I checked it for errors"?
You can use alternatives like "I proofread it", "I reviewed it", or "I verified it" depending on the context.
Is "I checked it for errors" grammatically correct?
Yes, "I checked it for errors" is grammatically correct. The sentence follows standard English grammar rules for subject-verb-object construction and prepositional usage.
In what contexts can I use "I checked it for errors"?
The phrase "I checked it for errors" can be used in various contexts, such as academic writing, professional communication, or personal correspondence, whenever you need to convey that you have reviewed something for mistakes.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested