The phrase "I can infer" is grammatically correct and is commonly used in written English.
It is typically used to indicate that the speaker is able to draw a conclusion or make an educated guess based on the information presented. Example: "From the actions of the suspect, I can infer that they had a motive for committing the crime."
For Gilbert, agent i knows that a proposition E is the case if, and only if, ω ∈ E, that is, E is true, and either i perceives that the state of affairs E describes obtains or i can infer E as a consequence of other propositions i knows, given sufficient inferential capacity.
James says, "Just let me look at one thing, and I can infer all the rest I've never seen".
I can infer the organism's subterranean habits from the appearance of those fruiting bodies – the mushrooms themselves – and from the fresher colour in the lawn.
I can infer that there are hidden areas in other people, so that they can't bear to talk of certain things.
(This is as best as I can infer from census data: the area corresponds to census tract 62.02 in the District of Columbia.
And then I can infer, I say well, the actual dimensionality of this is much lower than I expected, because these states actually have some connectivity.
Recently, we have demonstrated that with high-density SNP data, (i) we can infer recombination breakpoints with high precision (Li et al., 2010); (ii) our algorithm (Li and Li, 2009) can efficiently infer haplotypes and inheritance patterns for large pedigrees; and (iii) in most cases, inheritance can be uniquely determined for large pedigrees with large number of SNPs.
Using the definition x p ( i ) : = [ ad 2 ( L ( b p ( i ) ) ) − ad 2 ( L ( c p ( i ) ) ) ] / 4 and verifying x p ( i ) L ( a p ) = x p ( i ) L ( a p + i ) = 0, we can infer that x p ( i ) L ( a q − a q + j ) = 0 holds for all valid q and j.
But I hope we can infer that no deal has been done between the Conservatives and Labour to time publication so as to avoid any embarrassment for either party before next year's election".
If the activity you just mentioned would be covered in number (2), and number (2) were stricken, I think you can infer logically that paragraph (1) was not intended to cover it.
I guess we can infer that everything he has said up until that point e.g. the crux of the video, is a joke?
