Is it applicable to the mass of X? No, certainly not: we are able to logically infer the mass of any whole, including X, from knowledge of the masses of parts in isolation or in wholes other than X.
The two TCGA-02 samples were hybridized directly at Source C. The proposed MSCN was designed to: (i) be applicable to CN estimates from a wide range of technologies including, but not exclusively, microarrays, (ii) provide full-resolution normalized estimates and (iii) normalize each sample independent of the others.
In the present work, the life cycle assessment methodology is used for the environmental assessment of an assortment of 34 fruits and vegetables of a large Swiss retailer, with the aim of providing environmental decision-support to the retailer and establishing life cycle inventories (LCI) also applicable to other case studies.
Is that applicable to an English degree?
Is this applicable to the mass of a certain whole?
The first and final guidelines are, I believe, applicable to everyone, but it will be up to each of you to decide which of the others seem most useful in your particular circumstances.
The mathematical model has been constructed to i) be applicable to a population of interacting cells in proliferation, ii) to consider the cell population as a continuum density structured by the quantity p of transferable P-gp activity and iii) to have rules governing transfer.
In LTE, the RRC protocol is used to transfer common (i.e., applicable to all MSs) and dedicated (i.e., applicable to only a specific MS) non-access stratum (NAS) information [27].
In logic, we want the rules to be, for example, topic neutral, i.e., applicable to inferences (as far as possible) independent of specific subject matter.
However, we have A 1 < A 2 by the notations in [8] and the proof for (i) is not applicable to (ii).
