Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

I've included

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

I've included some below.

News & Media

The New York Times

I've included both.

I've included three of his original songs as well.

News & Media

The New York Times

For most of the remainder, I've included YouTube links below.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Talking of expensive, I've included an Anya Hindmarch purse here.

I've included my favourite – the Synthetic Epiphany Remix".

I've included some abuse too, to balance things up.

Since I've included "urban" systems, I'm excluding inter-city lines.

News & Media

The Guardian

"I've included a lot more checkpoints than last time," says Ohly. "And more peaks".

News & Media

Independent

Don't worry, I've included both videos for a moonlit stroll down memory lane.

News & Media

The New York Times

I've included the technical specifications for each photo — perhaps you'll find them useful.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "I've included", ensure the context makes it clear what you are referring to. Provide a specific list or reference to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "I've included" without clearly specifying what you have included. For example, instead of "I've included it below", specify "I've included the link below".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "I've included" functions as an introductory phrase to inform the reader or listener that something has been added or provided. It's a way of highlighting the inclusion of specific information, files, or other relevant items. Ludwig examples show it introducing links, documents, and various pieces of information.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Science

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "I've included" is a common and grammatically correct way to introduce additional content within a text or message. Ludwig shows that it is predominantly used in news and media contexts. While versatile, it's crucial to provide clear references to what you've included to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives like "I've added", "I've attached", or "I've provided" can be used depending on the specific context. Overall, it is a direct and straightforward way to guide your audience to relevant information.

FAQs

How to use "I've included" in a sentence?

You can use "I've included" to introduce something you've added to a document, email, or list. For example, "I've included the report for your review".

What can I say instead of "I've included"?

You can use alternatives like "I have added", "I've attached", or "I've provided" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "I've included"?

Yes, "I've included" is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase. It is a contraction of "I have included".

What is the difference between "I've included" and "I've attached"?

"I've included" generally means something is within the body of a text or list, while "I've attached" typically means it's a separate file or document added to an email or message.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: