(mbox{(i }Rightarrowmbox{(ii)}): Let (i) be valid.
If (i) is valid, then Theorem 1.4 yields (3.1) with.
This implies that assumption (i) is valid for the functional I when (tau=m) and (rho=epsilon>0).
Condition (i) is valid across a reasonably wide range of situations, including stress accumulation related to plate subduction.
Consequently, the conclusion (i) is valid, and hence the problem (1.1) has a solution on B ¯ r ( 0 ).
Note that, the bid b i is valid for α time slots, and each candidate relay bids in a sealed-bid manner.
If ID i is valid, S i computes M 8 = h (ID i || x s ).
If ID i is valid, S i computes M 4 = h (ID i || x s ) and M 5 = M 2 ⊕ M 4. (2) S i checks if M 3 = h (M 4|| M 5) or not.
To sum up, the main claim of [ 1], i.e., proportionality between V ip (i) and V g (i) is valid, but the value of the proportion coefficient ρ = V g (i)/ V ip (i) should be corrected.
Because DEA-R-I is valid and without a weight restriction assumption, this study puts forward the DEA-R-I as a capable substitutive model for CCR-I in order to avoid pseudo-inefficiency.
