Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
This part of the problem is why this is IMO #6, and I'll omit it since I'm just sketching methods here.
Similar(59)
So, we will omit it.
We can deal with the other cases similarly and thus we will omit it.
If (A=mathbb T ), we will omit it from the notation.
The proof is similar to that of Lemma 2.2 and will omit it here.
Since the analysis is rather similar to the current one, we will omit it in this paper.
Since the definition of convexity requires the existence of midpoint, the word geodesic is redundant and so, for simplicity, we will omit it.
In most applications the adjustment factor e − n / 2 N e is negligible, so we will omit it in what follows (Moorjani et al. 2012, Note S1).
(Things end violently and badly, as you can imagine, but the story is nonetheless suspenseful, and I'll omit the details since the book is very worth reading).
Sometimes I'll omit faces or just keep certain colors, things like that, all reinterpreted in the painting.
I'll omit the gory details, save for the fact that I was on a steady diet of Dayquil, Nyquil and Imodium.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com