Glaring deviation

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "Glaring deviation" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a noticeable or significant difference from a standard, norm, or expectation. Example: "The report highlighted a glaring deviation from the expected results, prompting further investigation."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Their paper confirms the statistical power law with one glaring deviation: the exceptional number of employers with exactly 49 employees and far fewer with 50 employees (another lesser deviation occurs on the margin between 9 and 10 employees).

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

The problems were glaring.

The New Yorker

The injustice is glaring".

The New York Times

Glaring at her.

The New Yorker

The changes are glaring.

The New York Times - Sports

The irony was glaring.

The New York Times

It is a glaring omission.

The New York Times

There are two glaring deficits.

The Economist

But there are glaring omissions.

The New York Times

The gap is becoming glaring.

The Economist

Mistakes are plentiful and glaring.

The New York Times - Magazine

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "glaring deviation" when you want to emphasize a particularly noticeable and problematic difference from an expected norm or standard.

Common error

Avoid using "glaring deviation" in casual conversation or informal writing. The phrase carries a formal tone and is better suited for analytical reports, academic papers, or professional communications. Simpler terms like "obvious difference" are more appropriate for everyday use.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "glaring deviation" primarily functions as a noun phrase where the adjective "glaring" modifies the noun "deviation". It highlights a significant and obvious departure from a norm, standard, or expectation. Ludwig AI confirms the correctness and usability of this phrase.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Formal & Business

20%

Science

20%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "glaring deviation" is a grammatically correct and usable phrase that denotes a significant and obvious departure from an expected norm. Ludwig AI indicates that while not overly common, it is appropriate in formal and professional contexts, particularly within news, business, and scientific domains. When a less formal tone is desired, alternatives such as "obvious discrepancy" or "striking divergence" can be considered to achieve a similar effect.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

obvious discrepancy

Emphasizes the clear and easily noticeable nature of the difference.

striking divergence

Highlights the marked difference in direction or tendency.

noticeable anomaly

Focuses on the irregularity that stands out from the norm.

clear inconsistency

Stresses the lack of agreement or logical connection.

significant departure

Underlines the importance and extent of the deviation.

marked variation

Highlights the extent of the difference or change.

patent irregularity

Stresses that the irregularity is evident and unconcealed.

conspicuous exception

Focuses on the instance that clearly does not conform to the general rule.

flagrant inconsistency

Emphasizes the shocking or scandalous nature of the inconsistency.

pronounced difference

Highlights the obvious and easily detectable nature of the difference.

FAQs

How can I use "glaring deviation" in a sentence?

You can use "glaring deviation" to point out a significant and obvious departure from a norm or expectation. For example: "The audit revealed a "glaring deviation" from standard accounting practices".

What are some alternatives to "glaring deviation"?

Alternatives include "obvious discrepancy", "striking divergence", or "noticeable anomaly", depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Is "glaring deviation" appropriate for formal writing?

Yes, "glaring deviation" is well-suited for formal writing, especially in contexts such as reports, analyses, and academic papers, where a noticeable and significant difference needs to be highlighted.

What's the difference between "glaring deviation" and "minor difference"?

"Glaring deviation" indicates a substantial and easily noticeable difference, while "minor difference" suggests a small and less significant variation. The choice depends on the magnitude of the difference you want to emphasize.