For prove

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "For prove" is not correct in English and does not convey a clear meaning.
It seems to be an attempt to express the idea of providing evidence or justification for something, but it is not a standard expression. Example: "I need to gather some documents for prove of my identity."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

For prove of our main results, we need the following results.

Advances in Difference Equations

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Allow two hours for proving.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

These are hard times for proven facts.

The New Yorker

"I'm proud of our guys for proving them wrong".

The New York Times - Sports

His propensity for proving doubters wrong is already obvious.

The Guardian - Sport

It is an instrument for proving guilt circumstantially — by association.

The New Yorker

"Thanks for proving that you don't have to kill somebody to get something like this.

The New York Times

What are the standards for proving a genetic test is valid?

The New York Times

A further prize, for proving the creative fecundity of late life, should be accorded Roth.

The New York Times

Mark Hughes deserves huge credit for proving what a shrewd strategist he can be.

The Guardian - Sport

Demolishing Section 4, however, confiscates the tools for proving you've been discriminated against.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming to express purpose using "prove", use the correct infinitive form "to prove" or rephrase to use a noun such as "proof".

Common error

Avoid using the base form of the verb "prove" after "for" when indicating purpose. Always use "to prove" or rephrase the sentence for grammatical correctness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "For prove" attempts to function as an expression of purpose, but fails due to grammatical error. The correct form to indicate purpose is to use "to prove". As Ludwig AI notes, this phrase is not standard English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "For prove" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in both formal and informal writing. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it's not a standard English expression. The correct way to express the intended meaning of providing evidence or justification is by using ""to prove"", "as proof of", or similar alternatives. While the phrase appears in a few sources, its incorrectness impacts its reliability and appropriateness. Always opt for grammatically sound alternatives to ensure clear and effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

To prove

Corrects the grammatical error by using the infinitive form of the verb.

As proof of

Uses a noun form to indicate the purpose of providing evidence.

In order to demonstrate

Replaces "prove" with "demonstrate" to showcase evidence.

To provide evidence for

Emphasizes the action of supplying supporting information.

To offer verification of

Focuses on confirming the truth or accuracy of something.

For substantiation

Highlights the need for supporting a claim or statement.

To validate

Highlights the process of confirming the validity of an assertion.

Toward verification

Indicates the direction or aim of verifying information.

In support of

Indicates providing assistance in backing up the statement.

With the aim of proving

Clarifies the intention behind an action.

FAQs

How can I properly use "prove" in a sentence to indicate purpose?

Use "to prove" instead of "for prove". For example, instead of "I need evidence for prove my point", say "I need evidence "to prove" my point".

What's the difference between "for proving" and "to prove"?

"For proving" is a gerund phrase that acts as a noun, while ""to prove"" is an infinitive phrase, often indicating purpose. Depending on context, the meaning can be similar, but "to prove" is generally more direct for expressing intent.

Is "for proof" a better alternative to "for prove"?

Yes, "for proof" is grammatically correct. "Proof" is a noun, making it suitable after the preposition "for", indicating the reason or purpose. "For prove" incorrectly uses the verb form.

Can I use "in order to prove" instead of "for prove"?

Yes, "in order to prove" is a grammatically sound alternative. It clearly expresses the intention or purpose behind an action, making it a suitable substitute for the incorrect "for prove".