Ai Feedback
Exact(32)
For Assumption 7 we consider two cases.
For assumption ((mathbf{H}_{3})), it is a standardization assumption for delay kernel functions.
For assumption ((mathbf{H}_{2})), the assumption of Lipschitz condition is very general since the common activations, such as piece-wise linear function, logistic sigmoid function and hyperbolic tangent function, all satisfy the Lipschitz condition.
For assumption of harmonic emission, the interval of values for the source parameters estimated are: the loop size is (0.3 5.1) × 1010 cm; the electron beam velocity is in the range of 0.16 0.53 c; the temperature of coronal loop top is of the order of (0.25 1.55) × 107 K; and the low limit for the magnetic field is of 7 26 G.
For assumption (i) Figure 1(a) demonstrates that for a majority of variables, the ability to determine whether or not they are active at phase t is vastly improved by around one order of magnitude when we know the state of the variables at t − 1.
For assumption ((mathbf{H}_{1})), the matrix intervals (D_{I}), (A_{I}), (B_{I}), (C_{I}) and (J_{I}) represent the allowed ranges of the parameters of the designed system due to parameter uncertainties caused by inaccurate measurements or environmental factors.
Similar(28)
Well, so much for assumptions.
Williams said it uses competitive prices only to validate its economic models, not as the basis for assumptions.
The second procedure is defined in dialectical terms, for assumption-based argumentation frameworks.
A three-tier framework for fostering agency for assumption-aware evaluation practice is proposed-agency for themselves (evaluators); agency for others (stakeholders); and agency for standards and principles.
The procedures are adapted from (variants of) corresponding procedures for computing the credulous admissible semantics for assumption-based argumentation, proposed in [P.M. Dung, R.A. Kowalski, F. Toni, Dialectic proof procedures for assumption-based, admissible argumentation, Artificial Intelligence 170 (2006) 114 159].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com