Expert considered

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "Expert considered" is not correct and lacks clarity in written English.
It may be intended to convey that something has been evaluated or deemed by an expert, but it is incomplete and does not provide a clear meaning. Example: "The findings were expert considered, leading to a more informed decision."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

7 human-written examples

Instead, he wants "expert considered judgment".

The Guardian

A brainy retired four-star admiral whose jobs included commander of the United States Pacific Command, he is also an Asia expert considered adept at running sprawling organizations.

The New York Times

CRITICS, chief among them Jane Jacobs, an urban expert, considered Mr. Logue to be a ruthless figure who imposed his will on communities, in the Moses fashion.

The New York Times

Peter Kennerley, author and Asian bird expert, considered that some of the illustrations are small and garish or technically inaccurate.

Wikipedia

A story the following year in a pro-government Ukrainian newspaper said Jackson described as a "renowned American expert"—considered Yanukovych to be a determined reformer who was "really tormented by the corruption that is killing his country".

Vice

Here, we turn to the performance of MIDAS in detecting CMBs across a range of 30 unselected patients with known CMB status based on manual identification by an expert, considered here as the reference standard to define the true positives.

Plosone

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

53 human-written examples

An expert considering a spot painting's authenticity will look at a number of things.

The New York Times - Arts

Experts considered it a curiosity.

The New Yorker

Experts considered her a political liability.

The New York Times

Some experts considered the test results "tremendously promising," but others were more cautious.

The New York Times

Less than five years ago, experts considered a several-thousand-zombie botnet extraordinary.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for clarity, opt for phrases like "evaluated by experts" or "expert assessment" to clearly indicate the source and nature of the consideration.

Common error

Avoid using "expert considered" as a standalone phrase. It often requires further context to be grammatically sound and easily understood. Always complete the sentence to clarify what the expert considered and what the outcome was.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "expert considered" functions as a descriptor, attempting to convey that something has been evaluated or taken into account by an expert. However, according to Ludwig AI, it's often grammatically incomplete and requires additional context to be fully understood.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

43%

Science

43%

Wiki

14%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "expert considered" appears in various sources, Ludwig AI indicates that its grammatical correctness is questionable and may lack clarity. It attempts to convey evaluation or assessment by an expert, but it's often best replaced with more explicit alternatives like "expert evaluation" or "considered by experts". Given its potential for ambiguity, it's advisable to use more precise language, especially in formal writing. Opting for clearer alternatives enhances communication and avoids potential misunderstandings. Although present in news and scientific articles, the phrase is best avoided in professional or academic settings to maintain formality and clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Expert evaluation

This alternative uses a noun phrase to emphasize the process of assessment by an expert.

Expert assessment

Similar to "expert evaluation", this uses a different noun to convey the evaluation process.

Considered by experts

This is a passive construction, placing emphasis on the experts doing the considering.

Experts have considered

This is an active construction, clearly attributing the consideration to experts.

Viewed by an expert

This highlights the perspective or opinion of a single expert.

An expert perspective

This emphasizes the viewpoint of an expert on a particular topic.

Evaluated by specialists

Uses "specialists" instead of "experts", suggesting a focus on technical expertise.

Subject to expert review

This phrase is more formal and suggests a systematic review process.

According to expert analysis

This phrase emphasizes the analytical aspect of the expert's work.

In the opinion of experts

This phrase directly presents the expert's viewpoint as an opinion.

FAQs

What are some alternatives to "expert considered"?

Consider using phrases like "expert evaluation", "expert assessment", or "considered by experts" for improved clarity.

Is "expert considered" grammatically correct?

While "expert considered" appears in some contexts, it's often perceived as incomplete. Using a more explicit phrase like "evaluated by an expert" typically results in clearer communication.

How can I use "expert considered" in a sentence?

If you choose to use "expert considered", ensure the sentence is complete. For example, "The data was "expert considered" before the final decision was made." However, alternatives like "The data underwent expert evaluation" are generally preferred.

When is it appropriate to use the phrase "expert considered"?

It's best to avoid "expert considered" in formal writing. In more casual contexts, if the meaning is clear from the surrounding text, it might be acceptable. However, more precise alternatives enhance clarity and professionalism.