If algorithms that give a point estimate for sensitivity of at least 90% for prediction of osteoporosis are considered, the algorithms that approximate or exceed this criteria in our patient population without modification from the developers recommendations, were the SCORE (100%) [ 6], Amsterdam(100%) [ 15], NOF (94%) and SOFSURF 89%) [ 7].
Peaks exceeding this criterion were considered to be robust among participants.
We only considered viral sequences from the GOS dataset that had top BLAST hits to known viral proteins, although many exceeded this criterion (i.e. had multiple BLAST hits to known viruses).
None of the typically developing children exceeded this criterion on any of the frequencies.
Assuming a hearing-impairment criterion of 30 dB HL, 59 of the 112 ears (53%) exceeded this criterion.
The 0.08 criterion for the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) was not achieved for the single factor or two factor model (Andrich & van Schoubroeck, [ 21]) or the GHQ-6 with the 90% confidence interval exceeding this criterion.
If the test statistic T exceeds this criterion level, i.e., T > cα, then the alternative model is rejected in favor of the true model (i.e., the fit of the alternative model to the data is significantly worse than the fit of the true model).
Percentages of discordant results exceeding this criteria, resulted in an alert signal given to the study site laboratory, which had to stop the testing and take corrective actions.
kern-nulldelimiterspace} {left( {V times B} right)_{y} }}} right|) exceeds 0.5, i.e., the mismatch of E y and −(V × B) y exceeds 50%%; this criterion is applied only when the electric field magnitude exceeds 0.5 mV/m to eliminate times of low-level electric fluctuations.
These geometric means do not exceed the criterion for classification as a POP under the SC (180 days) or as persistent under EC Regulation No. 1107/2009 (120 days).
