Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(6)
> During preference development, individuals cannot determine the contribution of different resources to digestive feedbacks because digestive feedbacks are averaged over mixtures of digested resources.
Moreover, two of them chose VOCA strategy during preference checks phase, while the third one equally chose both strategies.
Hampshire, A., Chaudhry, A. M., Owen, A. M. & Roberts, A. C. Dissociable roles for lateral orbitofrontal cortex and lateral prefrontal cortex during preference driven reversal learning.
There was no effect of fluoxetine on male preference, but fluoxetine significantly reduced the number of crossings and seconds of grooming during preference testing.
There was a significant difference in the mean number of Froot Loops consumed during preference training on the maze by the rats in the 3 groups (F 2,21) = 3.68, p < 0.05).
Table 1 shows the mean number of Froot Loops consumed during preference training on the radial maze and the mean volume of sucrose consumed during the post-training period for each of the treatment groups.
Similar(54)
During initial preference evaluation, half of the dish was illuminated with low intensity red light and half with high intensity blue light.
During the social preference period, lithium treatment caused a ∼55% decrease in time rearing and digging for the wild-type mice and a ∼54% decrease for the Fmr1 knockout mice, eliminating the significant difference between the genotypes (Fig. 3D).
During the social preference period, there was no significant difference in rearing and digging times between wild-type and GSK3 knockin mice (Fig. 6D, t(17) = 1.28, P = 0.218).
During the novelty preference test wild-type mice showed a strong preference to explore the novel arm in the 1 min ITI condition, whereas GluA1−/− mice did not show this preference.
During the social preference test, both Nrxn1α and Nrxn2α HET mice have weaker discrimination between Stranger 1 and Stranger 2 = 4.83, p =.011, pairwise comparison: WT vs. Nrxn1α Het p =.021, WT vs. Nrxn2α HET p =.033).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com