Detailed for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "Detailed for" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to indicate that something has been explained or elaborated upon, but it lacks proper context and structure. Example: "The report was detailed for the stakeholders to understand the project's progress."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This method is detailed for a well controlled example.

Combustion and Flame

THEY began an unbroken line of Cushmans, which Lou detailed for a visitor.

The New York Times

11 MILITARY MEN AT YALE.; Army and Navy Officers Are Detailed for Advanced Study.

The New York Times

DNA was extracted as detailed for Illumina NGS-Based 16S rRNA Sequencing.

Nature

Archives|11 MILITARY MEN AT YALE.; Army and Navy Officers Are Detailed for Advanced Study.

The New York Times

The nature of those allegations cannot be detailed for legal reasons.

The Guardian

A coterminal student must meet the course and scholarship requirements detailed for the M.S. below.

Stanford University

Although essential for critical tasting, these steps are too detailed for the dinner table.

Wine Tasting A Professional Handbook

Moreover, several challenges and their policy choices are detailed for the development of the Shenzhen ETS.

Energy Policy

The new Mojave Desert climate-landscape record is particularly detailed for the late Holocene.

Quaternary International

This procedure is detailed for a plate structure subjected to a harmonic concentrated load.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Replace the phrase "detailed for" with more precise language like "specified for", "outlined for", or "explained for" to improve clarity and grammatical correctness.

Common error

Avoid using "detailed for" when you can use a more direct and clear verb phrase that accurately reflects your intended meaning; this reduces ambiguity and enhances communication.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "detailed for" functions as a passive construction aiming to indicate that something has been elaborated upon or specified to someone or something. Ludwig AI indicates it's not the best option for a clear writing.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

48%

News & Media

31%

Academia

8%

Less common in

Formal & Business

8%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "detailed for" is frequently encountered across various domains such as science, news, and academia, Ludwig AI suggests it presents grammatical and clarity issues. As an alternative to enhance precision, consider using options like "specified for", "outlined for", or "explained for". The choice depends on the intended nuance—whether it's clarifying requirements, structuring an overview, or simplifying explanations. Although "detailed for" appears in authoritative sources, opting for clearer alternatives bolsters effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Specified for

Replaces "detailed" with "specified", focusing on the act of clearly indicating something for a particular purpose.

Outlined for

Emphasizes a structured presentation of information, using "outlined" instead of "detailed".

Assigned to

Shifts the focus to task delegation, indicating that someone is given a specific responsibility.

Designated for

Highlights the act of officially assigning someone or something to a role or purpose.

Explained for

Focuses on making something understandable, replacing "detailed" with "explained".

Elaborated on for

Suggests a more thorough and expansive explanation, using "elaborated on" to convey depth.

Presented in detail for

Emphasizes a comprehensive presentation, specifying that the information is given with thoroughness.

Described extensively for

Highlights the thoroughness of the description, focusing on the depth of information provided.

Chartered for

Indicates a formal assignment or commission for a specific task or role.

Instructed to

Focuses on giving clear instructions, changing the meaning slightly towards guidance.

FAQs

What is a better alternative to "detailed for"?

Consider using phrases like "specified for", "outlined for", or "explained for" depending on the context.

How can I use "specified for" in a sentence?

You might say, "The requirements are specified for the project in the document." This clarifies the requirements are explicitly laid out.

When should I use "outlined for" instead of "detailed for"?

Use "outlined for" when you are providing a structured overview. For example, "The plan was outlined for the team to understand the main steps".

Is "detailed for" grammatically correct?

While frequently used, "detailed for" is often considered grammatically weak. It's better to use more precise language to avoid ambiguity and improve sentence structure.