Designated for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "Designated for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something has been specifically assigned or allocated for a particular purpose or person. Example: "The funds have been designated for the new community center project."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

They exclude weapons designated for decommissioning.

The New York Times

Orosco was designated for assignment.

The New York Times - Sports

Shortly after, he was designated for assignment.

The New York Times - Sports

She is designated for death".

The New York Times

Pitcher TYLER WALKER was designated for assignment.

The New York Times - Sports

How is it designated for use?

The New York Times

Outfielder Raul Gonzales was designated for reassignment.

The New York Times - Sports

Both players were designated for assignment last week.

The New York Times - Sports

Meanwhile, infielder Josh Satin was designated for assignment.

The New York Times

Aardsma had been designated for assignment last week.

The New York Times

About $600,000 is designated for administering the coupon program.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "Designated for" when you want to clearly indicate that something has been officially assigned or allocated for a specific function or recipient. This can add clarity and formality to your writing.

Common error

Be specific about what is being designated and for what purpose. Instead of saying "The area is designated", specify "The area is designated for parking".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "Designated for" functions primarily as a verb phrase followed by a preposition, indicating that something has been officially assigned or allocated for a particular purpose. This aligns with Ludwig AI's assessment of the phrase as correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

54%

Science

24%

Formal & Business

8%

Less common in

Wiki

7%

Encyclopedias

3%

Academia

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "Designated for" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to denote that something has been officially assigned or allocated for a specific purpose. According to Ludwig AI, its usage is considered correct. Analysis of its usage patterns reveals its prevalence in news and media, and science-related content, indicating a formal to neutral register. When using "Designated for", ensure clarity in specifying what is being designated and its intended purpose to avoid ambiguity. Consider alternatives like "assigned to" or "intended for" to fit different nuances of meaning, and be mindful of the appropriate context for its usage.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Assigned to

Focuses more on the act of assigning rather than the purpose.

Allocated to

Emphasizes the distribution of resources to a particular recipient.

Intended for

Highlights the purpose or aim for which something is meant.

Reserved for

Suggests a specific holding or keeping aside for a purpose.

Set aside for

Implies a deliberate act of separating for a future use.

Earmarked for

Specifically set aside money or resources for a particular purpose.

Devoted to

Emphasizes dedication or commitment to a cause or purpose.

Specified for

Indicates that something has been explicitly named or stated for a purpose.

Catered to

Focuses on providing something that is needed or wanted by a particular person or group.

Purposed for

Highlights the purpose for which something has been created or adapted.

FAQs

How can I use "Designated for" in a sentence?

You can use "Designated for" to indicate that something has been officially assigned or allocated for a specific function or recipient. For example, "The funds are "earmarked for" the new community center project".

What's a good alternative to "Designated for"?

Depending on the context, you could use alternatives like "assigned to", "allocated to", or "intended for".

Is it correct to say "Designated to" instead of "Designated for"?

While "Designated to" might sound similar, "Designated for" is the more grammatically correct and commonly used phrase when indicating a purpose or recipient.

What is the difference between "Designated for" and "Reserved for"?

"Designated for" implies an official assignment or allocation, while "Reserved for" suggests that something is being kept aside or held for a specific purpose. "Reserved for" suggests that something is not for general use but specifically for someone or something.