Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(8)
DATE OF REVIEW -- Sept. 28, 2003 RATINGS -- Poor, Fair, Satisfactory, Good, Very Good, Excellent, Extraordinary.
DATE OF REVIEW -- Oct. 5, 2003 RATINGS -- Poor, Fair, Satisfactory, Good, Very Good, Excellent, Extraordinary.Ratings reflect the reviewer's reaction to food, ambience and service, with price taken into consideration.
It brings, for example, review data from CNET Reviews directly into search results (along with date of review).
‡Adjusted for date of review.
If neither occurred, survival was defined from the date of diagnosis to the date of review.
Other abstracted data included: date of review, funding recommendation, reimbursement criteria, and preferred outcomes (if stated).
Similar(52)
The starting date was January 2008, since, previously, bibliography was covered by the review of Urbonavicius et al. [ 17] and the end date of the review was April 2014.
Thus, the date of last review, Dnodisease or Dsurvival, was set to 2 weeks for those without any data for the first review.
Because restaurants are ever-evolving, however, changes may have occurred in menus, chefs and management since the date of the review.
Identify a valid criticism, check the date of that review and then check the date of the app's most recent software update and see if it has been addressed.
We are also aware of further articles being published since the end date of our review.
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com