Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(59)
Data was selected by one investigator (SV).
Data was selected from 24 sensor locations overlying the right and left IFA, TPA, and VOTA.
To validate the system, an adjacent field with 5 years of wheat yield data was selected.
A random time within the range of the background data was selected and assigned to the event for the reprojection.
Each group of experimental data was selected for comparison with the control groups using a single tail and type 1 t-test.
Based on this study, a subset of the most reliable measured data was selected for the FE model updating.
The best model fit to the field data was selected based on a number of statistical indicators and resulted in values of n=0.035 for channel and unvegetated substrate, n=0.15 for saltmarsh and n=0.5 for mangrove.
A single structure consistent with all of the spectral data was selected from the list of computer-generated structures.
In order to obtain evaluation results for user-based CF approach, random data was selected for prediction purpose.
After setting the slice interval to 1 mm and specifying the output range (FOV option), the DICOM server for storing data was selected and registered.
The model that best fitted the experimental data was selected based on the highest correlation coefficient (r), highest MSC, and the best curve fitting.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com