Critiques of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "Critiques of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing evaluations or analyses of a particular subject, work, or idea. Example: "The critiques of the novel highlight its complex themes and character development."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Critiques of Led Zeppelin III don't matter.

The Guardian - Music

Critiques of the Australian team have stretched beyond individual failings.

The New York Times - Sports

Critiques of Mr. Obama's speech were mostly diplomatic.

The New York Times

Critiques of this consensus have been offered up for decades.

The Washington Post

Critiques of the administration's efforts began even before Trump spoke.

The Washington Post

Critiques of rights come in two forms.

SEP

Critiques of Everyday Life.

Johns Hopkins University

The critiques of N.Y.U.

The New Yorker

First Glance critiques of new cars.

The New York Times

I like their critiques of mass culture".

The Guardian

Then look for critiques of IQ tests.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "Critiques of" to introduce well-supported arguments; avoid using it for unsubstantiated opinions.

Common error

Avoid presenting "critiques of" a broad topic without specifying which aspects are being addressed. Be specific to provide clarity and focus.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "critiques of" functions primarily as a noun phrase, often serving as a subject or object in a sentence. It introduces the topic of critical evaluations or analyses. Ludwig AI examples show it used to frame discussions, introduce arguments, and summarize evaluations.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Academia

28%

Science

27%

Less common in

Wiki

10%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "critiques of" is a versatile noun phrase used to introduce evaluations and analyses across various domains. As Ludwig AI has shown, it is grammatically correct and commonly used in both formal and informal contexts. While alternatives like "criticisms of" and "evaluations of" exist, "critiques of" is particularly effective for signaling an in-depth, analytical approach. Remember to specify what exactly is being assessed to avoid vagueness. Given its frequent use in authoritative sources like The New York Times and academic publications, mastering its usage will enhance your communication across diverse settings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Criticisms of

Replaces "critiques" with "criticisms", a direct synonym.

Evaluations of

Shifts from critique to a broader assessment.

Assessments of

Similar to evaluations, but implies a more structured judgment.

Analyses of

Focuses on detailed examination rather than judgment.

Reviews of

Suggests a formal or published evaluation.

Commentaries on

Highlights subjective perspectives and opinions.

Reactions to

Emphasizes responses and viewpoints following an event or work.

Perspectives on

Showcases varied opinions and viewpoints.

Judgments on

Replaces critiques with "judgments", a direct synonym.

Observations regarding

Suggests informal or casual remarks.

FAQs

How can I use "critiques of" in a sentence?

You can use "critiques of" to introduce a discussion about the evaluations or analyses of a particular subject. For example, "The "critiques of the film" focused on its lack of character development".

What are some alternatives to using "critiques of"?

Depending on the context, you could use alternatives such as "criticisms of", "evaluations of", or "analyses of".

Is it better to say "critiques of" or "criticisms of"?

Both "critiques of" and "criticisms of" are correct and largely interchangeable. "Critiques" may imply a more formal or in-depth analysis than "criticisms".

What is the difference between "critiques of" and "perspectives on"?

"Critiques of" generally refers to evaluations or analyses, often focusing on shortcomings or areas for improvement. "Perspectives on", however, suggests a range of opinions or viewpoints regarding a subject, without necessarily implying judgment.