Criticism of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "Criticism of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing or analyzing negative feedback or evaluation of a subject, idea, or work. Example: "The criticism of the new policy highlights several flaws that need to be addressed."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"Criticism of the company?

The New Yorker

Criticism of him is here.

The Economist

Criticism of the practice has grown recently.

The New York Times

Criticism of it is called treason.

The Economist

Criticism of his candidacy has been ample.

The Guardian

Criticism of Germany, by comparison, is muted.

The Economist

Criticism of a policy is welcome.

The New York Times

Criticism of all sorts has mounted.

The New York Times

Criticism of it barely figures in schoolbooks.

The Economist

Criticism, of course.

The New York Times

Criticism of the president?

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "criticism of", ensure the subject being criticized is clearly defined to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "criticism of" without specifying the aspects or elements being critiqued. Be specific to ensure clarity and avoid generalization.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "criticism of" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically acting as an adjective to modify a noun. It introduces the subject or target of the criticism, as demonstrated by Ludwig's examples. Ludwig AI shows that it commonly precedes a noun phrase, specifying what is being critiqued.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Academia

20%

Encyclopedias

10%

Less common in

Science

8%

Wiki

7%

Formal & Business

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "criticism of" is a highly prevalent prepositional phrase used to introduce a negative evaluation or analysis of a subject. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and frequent appearance in diverse sources, particularly in News & Media, Academia, and Encyclopedias. While grammatically straightforward, clarity is paramount when deploying this phrase. Therefore, always specify the focus of the criticism. Understanding its function, purpose, and register allows for effective and precise communication. The identified related phrases provide options for nuanced expression, while the writing guidance promotes accurate and impactful use.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Critique of

Uses a more formal synonym for "criticism", implying a detailed analysis.

Negative evaluation of

Replaces "criticism" with a more neutral term, focusing on the act of evaluating something negatively.

Disapproval of

Highlights the negative sentiment expressed in the criticism.

Objections to

Focuses on specific points of disagreement or opposition.

Adverse comments on

Emphasizes the negative nature of the feedback.

Unfavorable review of

Specifically relates to a formal assessment or judgment.

Censure of

Indicates strong disapproval or formal reprimand.

Condemnation of

Implies a strong moral disapproval or denunciation.

Rejection of

Highlights the refusal to accept or endorse something.

Analysis of flaws in

Focuses on identifying and examining weaknesses or defects.

FAQs

How do I use "criticism of" in a sentence?

Use "criticism of" to introduce negative evaluations or analyses. For example, "The criticism of the new policy highlights several flaws".

What are some alternatives to "criticism of"?

You can use alternatives like "negative evaluation of", "critique of", or "disapproval of" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "a criticism to" instead of "criticism of"?

No, the correct preposition to use with "criticism" in this context is "of". "A criticism to" is grammatically incorrect.

What's the difference between "criticism of" and "critique of"?

"Criticism of" generally refers to expressing disapproval, while "critique of" implies a more detailed and analytical assessment. The nuance lies in the depth and intention of the evaluation.