Corroborated with me

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "Corroborated with me" is not correct in standard English usage.
The correct expression would typically be "corroborated by me" or "corroborated with my input." Example: "The witness's account was corroborated by me during the investigation."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

This transmission of trauma has been corroborated with research.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

She is vastly corroborated with her phenomenal memory.

The New York Times

These have been corroborated with conventional analyses.

Microporous and Mesoporous Materials

Numerical results are corroborated with experiments.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

Results are corroborated with numerical simulations.

Chemical Engineering Science

Their accounts were corroborated with residents and local government officials.

The Guardian

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products also corroborated with the gene expression studies (Supplementary Fig. 2B).

Nature

These findings were corroborated with 3H-fluconazole sequestration data (Fig. 5b).

Nature

Back trajectory analysis results corroborated with the meteorological observations.

Marine Chemistry

Sometimes the revelation came as the result of a DNA test, which was then corroborated with some genealogical research.

The Guardian

The results corroborated with proteinase activity assays and zymography.

Phytochemistry

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming to express that you are the one providing the corroboration, use "corroborated by me" instead of "corroborated with me."

Common error

Avoid using "with" when you mean "by" to show agency. "With" typically indicates collaboration or means, while "by" indicates the agent performing the action.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "corroborated with me" is grammatically incorrect. The verb "corroborate" typically requires the preposition "by" to indicate who or what is providing the confirmation. Ludwig AI indicates that this phrase is not in standard English usage.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "corroborated with me" is grammatically incorrect, as pointed out by Ludwig. The correct phrasing is "corroborated by me" when you want to express that you are the one providing the corroboration. Using the preposition "with" is generally incorrect in this context, as "with" suggests means or instrument, while "by" indicates agency. While Ludwig provides numerous examples of "corroborated with", none of them use "me" as the object. Therefore, avoid this phrasing in formal and informal writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Corroborated by me

Changes the preposition to indicate that the corroboration is being done by the speaker.

Confirmed by my account

Replaces "corroborated" with "confirmed" and specifies that the speaker's account provides the confirmation.

My testimony corroborates it

Shifts the sentence structure to emphasize the speaker's testimony as the source of corroboration.

I can confirm that

A simpler way to state agreement or verification.

I verified it

Directly states that the speaker has verified something.

I attest to that

Uses "attest" to indicate a formal confirmation or witness.

I can vouch for that

Indicates personal assurance of the truth or accuracy of something.

I second that

A short phrase to express agreement with a statement.

I back that up

To provide support or confirmation for something.

My information supports that

States that the speaker's information aligns with the statement.

FAQs

What's the correct way to say something was confirmed by me?

The correct way to phrase this is using "corroborated by me". The preposition "by" indicates that you are the one doing the confirming.

Is it ever correct to use "corroborated with"?

Yes, but not when you are the one doing the corroborating. "Corroborated with" is used when something is confirmed using specific evidence or details. For example, "The witness's account was corroborated with evidence from the crime scene."

What's a more formal way to say "corroborated by me"?

More formal alternatives include "confirmed by my testimony", "verified by my statement", or "attested to by my declaration".

What can I say instead of "Corroborated with me" in a casual conversation?

In casual conversation, you can say "I confirmed it", "I can vouch for that", or "I second that".