Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

Consistent with previous

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "Consistent with previous" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to information, findings, or statements that align with earlier data or conclusions. Example: "The results of this study are consistent with previous research that indicated similar trends in behavior."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Consistent with previous research for England (Bowling and Windsor, 2008.

Consistent with previous research [ 48].

Consistent with previous studies [ 14].

The results in Long Island were consistent with previous studies.

News & Media

The New York Times

These are consistent with previous work.

Science

The Breast

This is consistent with previous findings.

This is consistent with previous studies.

These results are consistent with previous literature.

This observation is consistent with previous simulations.

This is a finding consistent with previous studies.

Reliability estimations were acceptable and consistent with previous literature.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "Consistent with previous", ensure you clearly cite the specific prior research or data you are referencing to maintain transparency and credibility.

Common error

Avoid using "Consistent with previous" without providing context about what specific previous findings you're referring to. Vague references can weaken your argument.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "Consistent with previous" typically functions as an adjectival phrase modifying a noun (e.g., results, findings, data). It indicates that the information being presented aligns with earlier established information. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically correct and widely used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

75%

News & Media

15%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "Consistent with previous" is a valuable tool for academic, scientific, and professional writing. It is used to indicate that new information aligns with established facts or research, enhancing credibility and building upon existing knowledge. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically correct and frequently used in different contexts, primarily in scientific publications. When using this phrase, remember to cite the specific prior research or data you are referencing to maintain clarity. While alternatives such as "in accordance with prior" or "aligned with earlier" exist, "Consistent with previous" is a direct and effective way to connect your work to existing knowledge.

FAQs

How can I use "Consistent with previous" in a sentence?

You can use "Consistent with previous" to show that new findings align with earlier research. For example, "The study's results are "consistent with previous" studies on the same topic."

What are some alternatives to "Consistent with previous"?

Alternatives include "in accordance with prior", "aligned with earlier", or "matches previous" depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "consistent with previous research" or "consistent to previous research"?

"Consistent with previous research" is the correct and more common phrasing. "Consistent to" is not typically used in this context.

What's the difference between "consistent with previous findings" and "similar to previous findings"?

"Consistent with previous findings" implies a logical agreement or alignment, while "similar to previous findings" simply suggests a resemblance. "Consistent with" often indicates a stronger, more direct connection.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: