Cast aspersions

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "Cast aspersions" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to describe the act of making damaging or disparaging remarks about someone or something, often implying a lack of evidence. Example: "During the meeting, she cast aspersions on his character, questioning his integrity without any proof."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Cast aspersions.

Huffington Post

But who was I to cast aspersions?

The New Yorker

I'm not dumb enough to cast aspersions on James's ability.

The New York Times - Sports

The leaks have not exclusively cast aspersions on Clinton.

The Guardian

My intention was not to cast aspersions at Whedon's competence.

The Guardian - Film

Who the hell is he to cast aspersions on others?

The Guardian - Opinion

And yet, that fact should not lead us to cast aspersions against all Maoist graphic design.

The New York Times - Books

This is not meant to cast aspersions on Florida Gulf Coast.

The New York Times

I don't want to cast aspersions, but at the least it's very troubling.

The New York Times

I don't want to cast aspersions on him... PK: So you know who it is?

Independent

Avon cast aspersions on its unwanted suitor's ability to finance a deal.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "cast aspersions", ensure you have a clear understanding of the context. The phrase implies a deliberate attempt to damage someone's reputation, so use it when that intention is present.

Common error

Avoid using "cast aspersions" in situations where the criticism is mild or unintentional. The phrase suggests a strong, often malicious, intent to harm someone's reputation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "Cast aspersions" functions as an idiomatic verb phrase. It describes the action of making defamatory or disparaging remarks, aiming to damage someone's reputation. As per Ludwig, the phrase is correct and usable in English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

85%

Formal & Business

7%

Science

4%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Encyclopedias

1%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "Cast aspersions" is a commonly used idiomatic verb phrase that describes the act of making damaging or disparaging remarks, often with the intent to harm someone's reputation. As noted by Ludwig, it's a correct and usable phrase in English writing. The phrase is frequently found in news and media contexts, reflecting its relevance in discussions of public figures and organizations. Alternatives include "slander", "defame", and "besmirch", each with slightly different nuances. Remember to use this phrase when describing a deliberate attempt to damage someone's reputation, and avoid it in cases of mild or unintentional criticism.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Slander

Focuses on spoken defamation, a direct and forceful accusation.

Defame

Implies damaging someone's reputation through false statements.

Besmirch

Suggests staining or tarnishing someone's reputation, often permanently.

Tarnish the reputation

Highlights the act of damaging one's good name.

Discredit

Emphasizes undermining someone's credibility or authority.

Denigrate

Signifies belittling or speaking disparagingly about someone.

Impugn

Implies challenging someone's honesty or integrity.

Vilify

Suggests portraying someone as evil or wicked.

Traduce

Focuses on malicious misrepresentation and slander.

诋毁

Chinese translation

FAQs

How can I use "Cast aspersions" in a sentence?

You can use "Cast aspersions" to describe someone making damaging or spiteful remarks. For example: "The politician's opponent tried to "cast aspersions" on his integrity."

What are some alternatives to "Cast aspersions"?

Alternatives include "slander", "defame", or "besmirch" depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Is it appropriate to use "Cast aspersions" in formal writing?

Yes, "Cast aspersions" is suitable for formal writing, especially in news reports, academic papers, or legal documents where you need to describe the act of making damaging statements.

What's the difference between "Cast aspersions" and "criticize"?

"Cast aspersions" implies a deliberate attempt to damage someone's reputation with often unfounded or exaggerated claims, while "criticize" simply means to express disapproval or point out faults without necessarily intending to harm.