Suggestions(2)
Exact(60)
By the hypothesis of this case,.
By the hypothesis (H2)(iii), v ∈ X ∗.
By the hypothesis, f is continuous in S ⊂ D1 uniformly for t ∈ T ; so is φ.
By the hypothesis, we see that (P preccurlyeq f)) is a nonempty poset.
By the hypothesis in, we have for all, so we can assume (2.9).
By the hypothesis ((F_{1}))-((i_{1})), T is an increasing operator.
By the hypothesis (H4), there exists a (N>0) such that (Vert xVert _{c}neq N).
By the hypothesis made on the operator, there exists such that (4.5).
By the hypothesis on the initial data, we obtain and for (see [2, 14]).
By the hypothesis, we have assumed that (operatorname{ind}(f,V neq0).
By the hypothesis, P is contained in Z ( G ). Therefore G is nilpotent.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com