Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(34)
By conclusion (1), we deduce that w ℘ ′ ( z ) is a rational Q of ξ : = ℘ ( z ).
By conclusion (ii), there are positive constants l and L such that (lle x t),y(t)le L) for all (tge t_{0}).
By conclusion (1), we deduce that w ℘ ′ ( z ) is a rational Q of ξ : = ℘ ( z ). (3) If w is non-odd and non-even, then rewrite w to the form of w ( z ) = w ( z ) + w ( − z ) 2 + w ( z ) − w ( − z ) 2. It is easy to know that w ( z ) + w ( − z ) 2 is even, and w ( z ) − w ( − z ) 2 is odd.
This is followed by conclusion.
This is followed by conclusion in last section.
We finished our study in "Conclusion" section by conclusion and future work.
Similar(25)
By Conclusions 1 4, the proof of Theorem 3.1 is completed.
The study is finally ended by conclusions and future research in "Conclusion".
Finally, in "Conclusions" the paper is summarized and followed by conclusions.
This is followed by conclusions in final section of the paper.
Case studies are presented and discussed in Section 4, followed by conclusions.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com