Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Analysis of sequencing data was conducted using Pyrosequencing Pipeline tools at RDP 10 (http://pyro.cme.msu.edu/index.jsp).jsp
Similar(11)
Sequences were examined for the possible chimeras using CHIMERA_CHECK online analysis at RDP-II website (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/cgis/chimera.cgisuSSU).msu.edu/cgis/chimera.cgisuSSU
Statistical comparison of 16S rDNA clone libraries was performed using online library compare tool at RDP-II website (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/comparison/comp.jsp).msu.edu/comparison/comp.jsp
At the phylum level, the relative proportions of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes were not significantly different among the three libraries, however, pairwise comparisons of each 16S rDNA library to every other library by using the online library compare tool at RDP-II (Naive Bayesian rRNA Classifier) revealed significant differences within the lower taxa levels (Table 3).
At high RDP levels (treatments 3 and 4), ground corn supported higher DM intake and yields of milk and protein than did cracked corn.
Reducing from 8to6 6% RUP decreased 3-methylhistidine concentration at 8% RDP, but not at 10% RDP.
6MP-AuNPs-RDP was prepared by conjugating the AuNPs with thiol groups of 6MP or RDP at pH 9.0.
All diets consisted of 65% bromegrass hay (8.9% CP, 61% NDF, and 37% ADF) plus 35% corn-based supplement and were formulated to contain ruminally degradable protein (RDP) at 8.5% of DM using a combination of soybean meal and urea.
Briefly, raw sequence data were processed by base-calling, quality-trimming and alignment, using the RDP pipeline server at the Ribosomal Database Project II (RDP-II) website http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/pipeline.msu.edu/pipeline
At the same time, there is a need for better coherence in the design and implementation of RDP programs among the several RDP axis and with pillar I policy.
These 16S rRNA sequences were compared with sequences from reference and type strains, as well as environmental clones, available at the GenBank and RDP II databases.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com