Don't assume that the proposition that you've been out in the market with before, the one that sells today, is going to be there in the future.
(a) Assuming the doubtful proposition that the Federal Government's exemption from state sovereign immunity can be delegated, 1362 does not embody a general delegation to tribes of the Federal Government's authority, under United States v. Minnesota, 270 U.S. 181, 195, to sue States on the tribes' behalf.
One may assume that this precedent stands for the proposition that proposals remain viable forever.
Assume that there is authority for the proposition that the impersonation of a husband vitiates consent for the purposes of rape.
Belated attempts by the government to call it the "abolition of the spare room subsidy" should be treated with the contempt they deserve beef wellington Beeton, Mrs (Isabella Mary Beeton, 1836-65) authof of The Book of Household Management begs the question This phrase is almost invariably misused: it means assuming a proposition that, in reality, involves the conclusion.
This phrase is almost invariably misused: it means assuming a proposition that, in reality, involves the conclusion.
It is a widely assumed but rarely tested proposition that the experience and expression of pain is altered among individuals with self-injurious behavior and disabilities.
On the other hand, Wittgenstein argues (§8), '[i]f you assume that the proposition is provable in Russell's system, that means it is true in the Russell sense, and the interpretation "P is not provable" again has to be given up,' because, once again, it is only the self-referential interpretation that engenders a contradiction.
For instance, if we assume that the proposition 'Artemisia is five years old' is now true, then that proposition is now possible; but it will presumably be impossible at some future time, namely once Artemisia has reached the age of six, since from then on it will never be true again (assuming linearity of time).
And indeed the propositions go further than this, since, in their essence, they assert that there is no governmental function, legislative or judicial, in Oregon, because it cannot be assumed, if the proposition be well founded, that there is at one and the same time one and the same government which is republican in form and not of that character.
Now, we assume that the proposition holds for k = 2, …, n.
