Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
As revised in
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "As revised in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a document or text that has been updated or modified in a specific section or version. Example: "The policy has been updated, as revised in the latest edition of the handbook."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Academia
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
59 human-written examples
All procedures followed were in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008 (5).
Science
This report was in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 and 2008.
Science
All study procedures followed were in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2013.
Science
All studies complied with the Declaration of Helsinki of 1975, as revised in 1983.
Science
The present study was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000.
Science
The trial was performed in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000.
Science
Procedures followed were in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 1983.
Science
The procedures followed were in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000.
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki 1975, as revised in 2000.
Science
The experiments were performed in accordance with Declaration of Helsinki of 1975, as revised in 2004.
The study was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "as revised in", always specify the date or version number to clearly indicate which revision you are referring to. This avoids ambiguity and ensures clarity for the reader.
Common error
Avoid using "as revised in" without specifying the date or version number. Without this information, it is unclear which revision is being referenced, leading to confusion and potentially misinterpreting the information.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "as revised in" functions as an adverbial phrase, modifying a verb or clause to indicate the specific version or date of a revision. Ludwig examples show its role in clarifying the context of guidelines, standards, or procedures.
Frequent in
Science
70%
Academia
15%
News & Media
7%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
3%
Formal & Business
3%
Wiki
2%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "as revised in" is a grammatically correct and frequently used adverbial phrase. Ludwig AI confirms its acceptability for indicating that something is based on an updated version, typically within formal contexts such as science, academia, and news media. To ensure clarity, always include the specific date or version number. Alternatives like "as amended in" or "as updated in" can be used depending on the nuances of the revision. Remember to specify the year or version number to avoid ambiguity, making your writing more precise and easily understood.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
As amended in
Replaces "revised" with "amended", emphasizing a formal change or addition.
As updated in
Substitutes "revised" with "updated", highlighting the introduction of new information.
As modified in
Uses "modified" instead of "revised", focusing on alterations made to the original content.
As altered in
Replaces "revised" with "altered", suggesting a more significant change or transformation.
According to the revision in
Changes the structure to a prepositional phrase, emphasizing adherence to the revised version.
Following the update in
Similar to "as updated in" but provides a chronological perspective.
Based on the amended version of
Highlights the reliance on an amended document or version.
In accordance with the latest revision of
Emphasizes compliance with the most current revised version.
As per the revised guidelines in
Highlights that something is done following the new rules.
Corresponding to changes in
Highlights that something has changed.
FAQs
How do I use "as revised in" in a sentence?
Use "as revised in" to indicate that something is based on an updated version of a document or standard. For example, "The procedures followed were in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, "as revised in" 2000".
What is a good alternative to "as revised in"?
Alternatives include "as amended in", "as updated in", or "as modified in", depending on the context and the specific type of change being referenced.
Is it necessary to include the year when using "as revised in"?
Yes, including the year or version number is crucial for clarity. It specifies exactly which revision is being referenced, preventing potential misinterpretations. For example, say "as revised in 2013" rather than just ""as revised in"".
What's the difference between "as revised in" and "based on"?
"As revised in" specifically indicates that something has been updated or modified, whereas "based on" simply means that something is derived from or uses something else as a foundation. You would use ""as revised in"" when referencing a specific updated version, and "based on" when the derivation is more general.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested