Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "as reviewed by" is correct and commonly used in written English.
It is typically used to introduce a review or evaluation of something by a specific person or source. Example: "As reviewed by The New York Times, the new restaurant received rave reviews for its innovative menu and exceptional service."
Exact(60)
However, the information on yield gains by available GM traits as reviewed by Graef et al.
The discussion about their function lasted until the first quarter of the 20th century as reviewed by Boothby in 1921.
As reviewed by Weir [20], chronic administration of aminorex does not produce PAH in monkeys, calves, rats or dogs.
As reviewed by Schuman [ 60], TrkB signaling becomes readily desensitized after binding BDNF.
As reviewed by Tsujii et al (1998), COX-1 expression regulates angiogenesis in endothelial cells.
As reviewed by Lau et al. (2004), perfluoroalkyl acids and their derivatives can cause developmental toxicity.
As reviewed by Black and Williams, formative feedback is known to improve student learning [ 25].
As reviewed by Buckner [ 16], Treg cell defects can lead to autoimmune diseases.
As reviewed by McCombe and Henderson, emerging evidence suggests the involvement of proinflammatory mechanisms in ALS.
As reviewed by Thaller et al. [ 18], dominance QTL effects are not negligible.
As reviewed by Larsson and Lernmark, these immunosuppressive drugs generally lose their disease-modifying capacities quite rapidly 88.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com