Possibly, both plots reflect the impact of including semi-annual coefficients and adjusted phases of each parameter in GPT2.
The mean annual runoff coefficient increased from 0.05 for established fallow (4 years) to 0.45 for old teak trees plantation (14 years) with intermediate values for crops.
This simple model presents the advantage of depending on only two parameters: α, a proportional factor allowing the historical atmospheric 137Cs fluxes to be reconstructed locally, and k, an annual loss coefficient from the plow horizon.
The six hydrological signatures fell into two categories: (1) long-term aggregated signatures – annual runoff coefficient, mean of log-transformed daily runoff, and zero flow ratio, and (2) signatures obtained from daily flow metrics – concavity index, seasonality ratio of runoff, and standard deviation of log-transformed daily flow.
In order to address this problem in various aspects, a more generalized state-level database is created including variables such as the annual Gini coefficient, gross domestic product (GDP), crop and property losses, percentage of people over 65, proportion of nonwhite population, and type of state senate.
The total annual runoff coefficients ranged between 0.23 and 0.81 in 2012 in the basin.
Consequently, the annual crop coefficients (ratio of wetland ET to pan evaporation) increased from 1.9 in the first year to 2.6 in the second.
The annual average coefficients of all the diffuse components in Xin'anjiang Basin were much greater than those in Miyun Basin, and showed significantly regional differences.
Lower elevation catchments show greater sensitivity to drought than higher elevation catchments, exhibiting sharp declines in annual runoff coefficients due to smaller average differences between evapotranspiration and precipitation, and switching from energy (demand) to supply (precipitation) limited water balances.
