Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
In keeping with the pluralism of meaningful predication (there is a plurality of things that we can meaningfully articulate judgments about), we cannot dogmatically presuppose that there is only one meaning of the 'being' addressed in our predicative activities.
It was a long while before he broke from the spell of Fichte's teachings and turned to philosophical realism, which asserts that underlying the world of appearances there is a plurality of things or "reals".
Firstly, it is argued that a plurality is always a plurality of things.
What Kant likely had in mind is nicely captured in a remark of Bennett's (1974, p. 83): to think of myself as a plurality of things is to think of my being conscious of this plurality, "and that pre-requires an undivided me".
Similar(56)
Kant uses this difference to argue that since the quantity of matter consists in a plurality of real things external to each other that cannot fade away (as consciousness might), the only way to decrease its quantity is by division.
Consider a plurality of F things, A, B, and C. By One-over-Many, each of A, B, C is F by virtue of partaking of a form of F-ness (say, F1).
From the existence of a plurality of F things and the fact that, for any such plurality P, there is a form of F-ness by virtue of partaking of which each member of P is F, it follows that there is one form "over" the many members of P (in the sense of being that by virtue of partaking of which each member of P is F).
But where a successful Lakers team funnels glib satisfaction down the throat of an already flattery-fattened city, a lousy Lakers team for instance, the one currently bumping along near the bottom of the NBA's Western Conference despite a starting lineup featuring a plurality of sure-thing Hall of Famers does the opposite.
The metaphysical view amounts to the claim that the world consists of a plurality of independently existing things exhibiting qualities and standing in relations.
Even from our partial experience of the "world-whole", Wolff believes that we can safely conclude that the world is a plurality of co-existing things and each given body is (itself) a composite whole.
The result is a plurality of pluralisms.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com