Sentence examples for A general regulation from inspiring English sources
The phrase "A general regulation" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a broad rule or guideline that applies to a particular area or context.
Example: "The organization has implemented a general regulation to ensure compliance with safety standards across all departments."
Alternatives: "A broad guideline" or "A universal rule".
These results agree with the presence of a general regulation since they are down-regulated in strain 50 64 and a partial increased expression is detected in strain 50-rev.
Carden is accused of maltreatment, assault and violation of a general regulation.
Financial interests of this kind may also be made nondisqualifying by a general regulation published in the Federal Register.
If improper disposal, not the sacrifice itself, is the harm to be prevented, the city could have imposed a general regulation on the disposal of organic garbage.
It is admitted that Johnson grass is a menace to crops, that it is propagated only by seed, and that a general regulation of it for the protection of farming would be valid.
However, such a scheme heavily depends on the unverifiable preferences of the individual insolvency administrator and will therefore not be implementable as a general regulation.
"Congress may regulate even noneconomic local activity if that regulation is a necessary part of a more general regulation of interstate commerce," he wrote, in a passage that the Obama administration quoted prominently in a recent brief in the health care case.
Congress can regulate "even noneconomic local activity if that regulation is a necessary part of a more general regulation of interstate commerce," he wrote.
Justice Scalia wrote then, "Congress may regulate even noneconomic local activity if that regulation is a necessary part of a more general regulation of interstate commerce".
Moreover, as the passage from Lopez quoted above suggests, Congress may regulate even noneconomic local activity if that regulation is a necessary part of a more general regulation of interstate commerce.
In addition, Scalia felt that Congress may regulate intrastate activities if doing so is a necessary part of a more general regulation of interstate commerce.
