Exact(4)
Type A CBMs bind the surface of complex polysaccharides, type B CBMs (with specificity for amorphous regions) recognize internal glycan chains (endo type), and type C CBMs (with specificity for crystalline regions) bind the termini of glycans (exo type), according to Bornscheuer et al. (2014) and Fontes and Gilbert (2010).
Type A CBMs (e.g. CBM2 and CBM3), which are more commonly associated with binding to insoluble, highly crystalline cellulose, were not identified as relevant by eSVMbPFAM.
Type A CBMs interact with the planar surfaces of crystalline polysaccharides, such as cellulose, through interactions between aromatic amino acid side chains of Trp, Tyr, and Phe [ 41, 42] and the polysaccharide.
CBMs that are specific for insoluble cellulose can be grouped into two general categories: those that interact with crystalline cellulose (type A CBMs) and those that interact with non-crystalline cellulose (cello-oligosaccharides in addition to insoluble cellulose) (type B CBMs, [ 20] the so-called targeting function).
Similar(56)
Maxisorp ELISA plates (Nunc A/S, Roskilde, Denmark) were coated with 1 μg/ml each of the dockerin-containing enzymes 48S- t, 9K- a and 8A- b, and then interacted with 0.1 to 1,000 ng/μl of its matching CBM-cohesin (CBM-Coh T, CBM-Coh A and CBM-Coh B) counterpart.
A CBM domain is constructed on the artificial scaffoldin, which serves as the harboring backbone.
A CBM is a polypeptide module found in carbohydrate-active enzymes that can specifically bind to different carbohydrates.
A CBM is defined as a contiguous amino acid sequence within a carbohydrate-active enzyme with a discreet fold having carbohydrate-binding activity.
a CBM or dockerin implying that the enzyme is part of a cellulosome containing CBMs.
The structure of the bibliography that could be created starting from a CBM article.
Open image in new window Fig. 1 CBM extraction process Open image in new window Fig. 2 Typical production curve of a CBM reservoir.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com